Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Stratification-score matching improves correction for confounding by population stratification in case-control
Michael P Epstein1, Richard Duncan, K Alaine Broadaway
1Department of Human Genetics, Emory University, 615 Michael Street, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. mpepste@emory.edu
A new method improves genetic ancestry matching in case-control studies by using a stratification score. This ensures more accurate control of population stratification, enhancing the validity of genetic association analyses.
Area of Science:
- Population Genetics
- Statistical Genetics
- Genomic Epidemiology
Background:
- Controlling for population stratification is essential for accurate case-control association studies.
- Fine matching on genetic ancestry is a common strategy to address confounding in genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and sequencing studies.
- Current matching methods may improperly control confounding by combining non-confounding ancestry components.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a novel method for matching cases and controls based on the stratification score to improve control of population stratification.
- To address the limitations of existing methods that combine multiple ancestry components into a single measure.
- To enhance the accuracy of matches and the validity of genetic association analyses.
Main Methods:
- Developed a novel matching method using the stratification score, defined as the probability of disease given genomic variables.
- Applied the method to the African-American cohort of the GAIN GWAS of schizophrenia.
- Utilized simulated data to compare the performance of the novel method against existing approaches.
Main Results:
- The proposed stratification score matching method effectively resolved confounding due to population stratification in the schizophrenia GWAS data.
- Existing matching procedures failed to adequately control for confounding in the same dataset.
- Simulated data confirmed that the novel approach provides a more appropriate correction for population stratification than current methods.
Conclusions:
- Matching on the stratification score leads to more accurate case-control matches by aligning participants with similar disease risk given ancestry.
- This novel method offers a superior approach for controlling population stratification compared to existing techniques.
- The findings have significant implications for improving the reliability of genetic association studies, particularly in diverse populations.
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Stratified Sampling Method
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Test for Homogeneity
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies