Successful coronary artery bypass grafting with the aid of a portable minimized extracorporeal life support system

Assad Haneya1, Alois Philipp, Daniele Camboni

  • 1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany. assadhaneya@web.de

ASAIO Journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992)
|June 22, 2012
PubMed

Insights

The Cardiohelp extracorporeal life support system offers a safe and effective alternative for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery, demonstrating reduced blood transfusions and shorter intensive care unit stays.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Medical Devices
  • Cardiopulmonary Support

Background:

  • Extracorporeal life support (ECL S) is established for cardiac failure, transplantation, and shock.
  • Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a common cardiac surgical procedure.
  • Evaluating novel extracorporeal circulation systems is crucial for improving patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the early clinical experience with the Cardiohelp system in CABG patients.
  • To compare the outcomes of Cardiohelp-assisted CABG with minimized extracorporeal circulation (MECC) and conventional extracorporeal circulation (CECC).

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study involving 50 patients undergoing CABG with Cardiohelp.
  • Matched comparison with 100 patients (50 MECC, 50 CECC) from the same period.
  • Analysis of intraoperative blood transfusion, postoperative biochemical markers, ventilation duration, and ICU length of stay.

Main Results:

  • Cardiohelp and MECC groups showed significantly lower intraoperative blood transfusion rates compared to CECC (36% and 40% vs. 64%).
  • Lower postoperative creatinine kinase and lactate levels were observed in Cardiohelp and MECC groups (p < 0.001).
  • Shorter ventilation duration and ICU length of stay were noted in the Cardiohelp and MECC groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusions:

  • The Cardiohelp system is a safe and effective alternative for CABG surgery.
  • Technical innovations and minimal side effects support its use in coronary surgery.
  • No device-related complications or need for conversion to CECC were reported.

Related Concept Videos