Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026
09:52
Measuring and Manipulating Functionally Specific Neural Pathways in the Human Motor System with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: February 23, 2020
Comparative effectiveness and implementation research: directions for neurology
Barbara G Vickrey1, Deborah Hirtz, Salina Waddy
1Department of Neurology, University of California at Los Angeles, CA, USA. bvickrey@ucla.edu
Annals of Neurology
|June 22, 2012
Summary
Translational research in neurological disease needs implementation and comparative effectiveness studies. These studies bridge the gap between discovering new therapies and their widespread use, improving patient health outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Health Services Research
- Translational Science
Background:
- Significant gap exists in translating neurological discovery and translational research into population-level health improvements.
- Randomized controlled trials establish therapy efficacy, but implementation research is needed to understand and overcome barriers to widespread clinical adoption.
- Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is crucial for evaluating the relative value of different management strategies for neurological disorders.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the critical need for implementation research and comparative effectiveness research (CER) in neurology.
- To inform neurologists and neuroscientists about the scope, objectives, and methodologies of these research areas.
- To emphasize the importance of closing the evidence-to-practice gap in neurological care.
Main Methods:
- The abstract discusses various methodological approaches including formal literature syntheses, randomized trials, observational studies, and modeling.
- It also references existing research resources such as centers for literature synthesis, registries, and practice networks.
- The focus is on understanding how to generate knowledge for practical application in neurological disease management.
Main Results:
- There is an unmet need for research that translates discoveries into measurable health improvements and reduced mortality in neurological disease.
- Implementation research identifies barriers to therapy uptake and strategies to overcome them, addressing health disparities.
- CER compares the clinical benefits, harms, and costs of alternative efficacious management approaches.
Conclusions:
- Neurologists and neuroscientists must understand CER and implementation research to bridge the evidence-to-practice gap.
- Future directions include building research capacity, training scientists, and developing innovative strategies for research prioritization.
- Investing in these research areas is essential for advancing neurological patient care and outcomes.
