Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Acupoint Catgut Embedding Therapy in Traditional Chinese Medicine for Managing Allergic Rhinitis
Published on: December 20, 2024
Ambient AI Scribes in Clinical Practice: A Randomized Trial
Paul J Lukac1,2, William Turner3, Sitaram Vangala3
1Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ambient AI scribes show promise in reducing physician documentation time and burnout. One AI scribe, Nabla, significantly decreased time-in-note, while both AI scribes potentially improved physician burnout and task load.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Clinical Documentation
Background:
- Ambient artificial intelligence (AI) scribes offer a potential solution to the significant documentation burden and physician burnout.
- Despite their promise, the real-world impact of AI scribes has not been rigorously evaluated in randomized clinical trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of two ambient AI scribe applications, Microsoft Dragon Ambient eXperience (DAX) Copilot and Nabla, on physician documentation time and burnout.
- To compare the effectiveness of DAX Copilot and Nabla against a usual-care control group in a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.
Main Methods:
- A parallel three-group pragmatic randomized clinical trial involving 238 physicians across 14 specialties.
- Physicians were randomized 1:1:1 to either DAX Copilot, Nabla, or a usual-care control group.
- Primary outcome was change in log writing time-in-note; secondary outcomes included physician task load and burnout scores.
Main Results:
- Nabla use was associated with a statistically significant 9.5% decrease in time-in-note compared to the control group (P=0.02).
- DAX Copilot did not show a significant change in time-in-note compared to the control group (P=0.66).
- Both DAX Copilot and Nabla users reported potential improvements in physician task load, burnout, and work exhaustion scores, though findings require further validation.
Conclusions:
- Nabla demonstrated a significant reduction in physician time-in-note, suggesting its effectiveness in streamlining documentation.
- Both AI scribes showed potential benefits for physician well-being, but further multicenter trials are needed to confirm these secondary outcomes.
- Clinicians perceived similar performance between the two AI scribe platforms, highlighting the need for ongoing vigilance regarding occasional inaccuracies.
More Related Videos
04:53Author Spotlight: Traditional Chinese Medicine for Sleep Disorders in Acute COPD — A Safe, Cost-Effective Approach
Published on: October 18, 2024
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Blind Procedures
Blinding
Bias in Epidemiological Studies