Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Chunking01:12

Chunking

Chunking is a powerful cognitive technique that improves short-term memory retention by organizing information into smaller, more manageable units. The brain, limited by working memory capacity, can more easily process and store information when it is divided into "chunks" rather than presented as discrete, unrelated elements. Chunking is especially useful when dealing with large amounts of information, such as numerical sequences, words, or complex ideas.
The principle behind chunking is...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sensory horizons, reality monitoring, and the higher-order nature of consciousness: A critical look.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Confidence in naturalistic decision making.

Neuroscience of consciousness·2026
Same author

Visual field inhomogeneities and the architectonics of early visual cortex shape visual working memory.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same author

Convergent validation of the Involuntary Autobiographical Memory Inventory across levels of analysis in a Polish sample.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Neither the number of feature dimensions nor their task relevance necessarily affect interocular grouping in binocular rivalry.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

TMS to preSMA, but not rIFG, impacts strategy use in multi-attribute choice.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Ego Depletion and Time Pressure Promote Spontaneous Deception:An Event-Related Potential Study.

Advances in cognitive psychology·2024
Same journal

Auditory Attentional Load Modulates Audiovisual Integration During Auditory/Visual Discrimination.

Advances in cognitive psychology·2024
Same journal

Task Interference in Prospective Memory: Adopting a Retrieval Mode and Checking for Targets.

Advances in cognitive psychology·2024
Same journal

Is Exposure to the Memories of Others a Necessary Precondition for Collaborative Inhibition?

Advances in cognitive psychology·2024
Same journal

Psychological Evaluation of Attention Indices and Directed Visual Perception Using Neurofeedback Training.

Advances in cognitive psychology·2024
Same journal

Prospective and Retrospective Verbal Time Estimationin Children with ADHD.

Advances in cognitive psychology·2024
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

Manipulating attentional load in sequence learning through random number generation.

Michał Wierzchoń, Vinciane Gaillard, Dariusz Asanowicz

    Advances in Cognitive Psychology
    |June 23, 2012
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Implicit learning, while often effortless, requires attention. This study found that demanding secondary tasks, like random number generation (RNG), impair sequence learning more than less demanding tasks, like tone counting (TC).

    Keywords:
    attentionimplicit learningrandom number generation taskserial reaction time tasktone counting task

    More Related Videos

    Reducing State Anxiety Using Working Memory Maintenance
    08:17

    Reducing State Anxiety Using Working Memory Maintenance

    Published on: July 19, 2017

    The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
    10:39

    The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

    Published on: May 3, 2018

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 21, 2026

    Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
    08:05

    Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

    Published on: June 30, 2020

    Reducing State Anxiety Using Working Memory Maintenance
    08:17

    Reducing State Anxiety Using Working Memory Maintenance

    Published on: July 19, 2017

    The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
    10:39

    The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

    Published on: May 3, 2018

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Neuroscience
    • Human Attention Studies

    Background:

    • Implicit learning is typically viewed as an automatic cognitive process.
    • However, dual-task studies suggest attentional engagement is crucial for implicit sequence learning.
    • Discrepancies may arise from the varying attentional demands of different secondary tasks.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the role of attention in implicit sequence learning using dual-task paradigms.
    • To compare the attentional demands of random number generation (RNG) and tone counting (TC) as secondary tasks.
    • To determine how these secondary tasks interfere with serial reaction time (SRT) task performance and sequence learning.

    Main Methods:

    • Three experiments were conducted involving a serial reaction time (SRT) task.
    • Participants performed the SRT task concurrently with either a random number generation (RNG) task or a tone counting (TC) task.
    • Sequence knowledge was assessed using a subsequent sequence generation task.

    Main Results:

    • Sequence learning was consistently observed across all experiments.
    • Dual-task conditions significantly impaired sequence learning compared to single-task conditions.
    • The random number generation (RNG) task demonstrated greater interference with learning than the tone counting (TC) task.
    • However, no significant effects of the secondary task were found in the subsequent sequence generation phase.

    Conclusions:

    • Attention plays a critical role in implicit sequence learning, with more demanding secondary tasks causing greater impairment.
    • Random number generation (RNG) is a more attentionally demanding task than tone counting (TC) in the context of sequence learning.
    • Further research using RNG is recommended to better understand attentional mechanisms in implicit learning and SRT tasks.