Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Thymus-expressed chemokine promotes survival of PC12 cells via PI3K pathway.

Neurochemistry international·2011
Same author

Retinoic acid signaling sequentially controls visceral and heart laterality in zebrafish.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2011
Same author

A Drosophila model of the neurodegenerative disease SCA17 reveals a role of RBP-J/Su(H) in modulating the pathological outcome.

Human molecular genetics·2011
Same author

Overexpression and small molecule-triggered downregulation of CIP2A in lung cancer.

PloS one·2011
Same author

Antibiofouling hybrid dendritic Boltorn/star PEG thiol-ene cross-linked networks.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2011
Same author

An absolute test for axicon surfaces.

Optics letters·2011
Same journal

Facial iPPG heatmap patterns based on period-aware autoencoder show association with carotid atherosclerosis towards non-contact hemodynamic assessment.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning models predict liver fibrosis risk and outcome in the general population: Development and multi-cohort external validation.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of surrogate endpoints for survival outcomes using the surrogate package in R.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2026
Same journal

Relative spectral and frication-based descriptors as numerical indicators of place of articulation shifts in fricatives produced by Polish children.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2026
Same journal

Leaflet resection improves valve expansion and hemodynamic performance in redo TAVI with balloon- and self-expanding transcatheter heart valve configurations.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2026
Same journal

Spectral super-resolution for Parkinson's voice via representation-level methods under mixed-reality acquisition.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Algorithm for balancing both continuous and categorical covariates in randomized controlled trials.

Lan Xiao1, Veronica Yank, Jun Ma

  • 1Department of Health Services Research, Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, 795 El Camino Real, Ames Building, Palo Alto, CA, United States. xiaol@pamfri.org

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
|June 26, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new, accessible R software algorithm for multi-arm clinical trial randomization, balancing patient characteristics effectively. The method ensures fair treatment allocation, improving clinical trial design and reproducibility.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Minimization is a method for balancing covariates in clinical trials.
  • Existing extensions balance continuous and categorical covariates but are limited to two-arm trials.
  • Current algorithms are not widely available to researchers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To adapt and extend minimization algorithms for multi-arm randomized controlled trials.
  • To incorporate Efron's biased coin method for reduced assignment predictability.
  • To provide publicly accessible R software for trialists.

Main Methods:

  • Adapted Endo et al.'s algorithm for multi-arm trials (two or more arms).
  • Integrated Efron's biased coin method to enhance randomization unpredictability.
  • Developed R code for the modified algorithm, offering guidance on parameter selection.
  • Simulated performance using data from a three-arm trial with multiple covariates.

Main Results:

  • The modified algorithm and R code effectively balanced continuous and categorical covariates.
  • Performance was comparable to an existing multi-arm biased coin minimization method.
  • The developed R code is readily available for use by clinical trialists.

Conclusions:

  • The new algorithm and software provide a valuable tool for multi-arm clinical trial randomization.
  • The method successfully balances covariates, enhancing trial integrity.
  • Increased accessibility of advanced randomization techniques can improve clinical research.