Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

10:20
Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells
Published on: March 24, 2023
Automated analysis of flow cytometric data for CD34+ stem cell enumeration using a probability state model.
Donald J Herbert1, David T Miller, C Bruce Bagwell
1Verity Software House, Topsham, Maine 04086, USA. djh@vsh.com
Cytometry. Part B, Clinical Cytometry
|June 26, 2012
Summary
Automated Probability State Modeling (PSM) offers a reproducible and objective method for enumerating hematopoietic stem cells (SC), matching the accuracy of the standard ISHAGE gating technique.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Immunology
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Flow cytometry is crucial for enumerating hematopoietic stem cells (SC) in various biological samples.
- The ISHAGE single-platform gating method is the established standard for CD34+ SC enumeration.
- Challenges in uniform ISHAGE application necessitate advanced analytical approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and evaluate an automated, multivariate classification method, Probability State Modeling (PSM), for SC analysis.
- To compare the performance of automated PSM analysis against manual ISHAGE gating.
Main Methods:
- 258 samples were analyzed using BD FACSCanto II flow cytometers.
- Stain-lyse-no-wash technique with CD34, CD45, 7-AAD, and light scatter for population definition.
- Automated PSM was developed to classify events (beads, debris, cells) and quantify intact-live SC.
Main Results:
- Excellent agreement between ISHAGE and PSM for SC concentration (r² = 0.999).
- Bland-Altman analysis showed minimal bias (2.018 SC/μL) with a wide 95% confidence interval.
- PSM demonstrated perfect operator-to-operator reproducibility (r² = 1.000).
Conclusions:
- Automated PSM analysis of SC data strongly correlates with ISHAGE gating results.
- PSM offers superior reproducibility, objectivity, and speed compared to manual gating.
- The PSM approach achieves accuracy at least equivalent to the established ISHAGE method.

