Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Radiation Pressure: Problem Solving01:09

Radiation Pressure: Problem Solving

The radiation pressure applied by an electromagnetic wave on a perfectly absorbing surface equals the energy density of the wave. The wave's momentum also gets transferred to the surface when an electromagnetic wave is entirely absorbed by it. The rate at which momentum is transmitted to an absorbing surface perpendicular to the propagation direction equals the force on the surface.
The average value of the rate of momentum transfer divided by the absorbing area represents the average force per...
Biological Effects of Radiation02:59

Biological Effects of Radiation

All radioactive nuclides emit high-energy particles or electromagnetic waves. When this radiation encounters living cells, it can cause heating, break chemical bonds, or ionize molecules. The most serious biological damage results when these radioactive emissions fragment or ionize molecules. For example, α and β particles emitted from nuclear decay reactions possess much higher energies than ordinary chemical bond energies. When these particles strike and penetrate matter, they produce ions...
Radiation: Applications01:17

Radiation: Applications

The average temperature of Earth is the subject of much current discussion. Earth is in radiative contact with both the Sun and dark space; it receives almost all its energy from the radiation of the Sun and reflects some of it into outer space. Dark space is very cold, about 3 K, so Earth radiates energy into it. For instance, heat transfer occurs from soil and grasses, the rate of which can be so rapid that frost can occur on clear summer evenings, even in warm latitudes.
The average...
Nuclear Power02:36

Nuclear Power

Controlled nuclear fission reactions are used to generate electricity. Any nuclear reactor that produces power via the fission of uranium or plutonium by bombardment with neutrons has six components: nuclear fuel consisting of fissionable material, a nuclear moderator, a neutron source, control rods, reactor coolant, and a shield and containment system.
Nuclear Fuels
Nuclear fuel consists of a fissile isotope, such as uranium-235, which must be present in sufficient quantity to provide a...
Isotopes and Radioisotopes01:28

Isotopes and Radioisotopes

In the early 1900s, English chemist Frederick Soddy realized that an element could have atoms with different masses that were chemically indistinguishable. These different types are called isotopes — atoms of the same element that differ in mass. Isotopes differ in mass because they have different numbers of neutrons but are chemically identical because they have the same number of protons. Soddy was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1921 for this discovery.
An isotope containing more...
Absorption of Radiation01:05

Absorption of Radiation

The rate of heat transfer by emitted radiation is described by the Stefan-Boltzmann law of radiation:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cancer complexity and radiation protection.

Health physics·2014
Same author

The dose from Compton backscatter screening.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2010
Same author

Policy decision-making under scientific uncertainty: radiological risk assessment and the role of expert advisory groups.

Health physics·2009
Same author

Heart disease awareness among college students.

Journal of community health·2004
Same author

HPS has established an acceptable dose.

Health physics·2004
Same author

Bomb dosimetry unlikely to change risk estimates.

Nature·2003
Same journal

Retraction: Flucytosine and Amphotericin B Coadministration Induces Dose-Related Renal Injury.

Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society·2026
Same journal

miRNA-Targeted Herbal Compounds Against Gastric Precancerous Evolution in Chronic Atrophic Gastritis.

Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society·2026
Same journal

Plant-Mediated Fabrication of Iron and Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles for Anticancer Efficacy Against HT-29 and HepG2 Cells.

Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society·2026
Same journal

Total <i>Sanghuangporus vaninii</i> Extract Ameliorates Cisplatin-Induced Glioma Cell Death by Regulating Ferroptosis and Inflammation.

Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society·2026
Same journal

Causal Association Between Gut Microbiota, Plasma Metabolites, and Prostate Cancer: Two-Step Mendelian Randomization Study.

Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society·2026
Same journal

DMSO Protects Against Radiation-Induced Ovarian Injury by Preserving Mitochondrial Function and Alleviating DNA Damage.

Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ &alpha; and &beta; Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

The LNT Debate in Radiation Protection: Science vs. Policy.

Kenneth L Mossman1

  • 1Arizona State University.

Dose-Response : a Publication of International Hormesis Society
|June 29, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The linear no-threshold (LNT) theory for radiation protection lacks sufficient scientific evidence for exclusive policy adoption. A broader policy and economic perspective is needed to address radiation risk management effectively.

Keywords:
ALARALNTpolicyradiation protectionscience

More Related Videos

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities
06:51

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities

Published on: February 20, 2021

An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the &#947;-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes
08:23

An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the γ-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes

Published on: December 25, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ &alpha; and &beta; Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities
06:51

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities

Published on: February 20, 2021

An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the &#947;-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes
08:23

An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the γ-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes

Published on: December 25, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Radiation protection science
  • Risk assessment
  • Policy analysis

Background:

  • The linear no-threshold (LNT) theory is the basis for current radiation protection systems globally.
  • Scientific evidence is insufficient to exclusively support LNT over alternative theories like threshold models.
  • Risk assessment at low effective doses (<100 mSv) remains highly uncertain.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the limitations of a purely scientific approach to the LNT debate.
  • To advocate for a policy-centered perspective incorporating social and economic factors.
  • To analyze the LNT debate as a risk management challenge.

Main Methods:

  • Critical review of the scientific basis for radiation protection theories.
  • Analysis of the LNT debate from social and economic viewpoints.
  • Examination of policy alternatives and risk management frameworks.

Main Results:

  • Current science cannot definitively establish a dose threshold for radiation effects.
  • Multiple dose-response models, including threshold and non-linear functions, are scientifically defensible.
  • A narrow scientific focus is inadequate for resolving the LNT policy debate.

Conclusions:

  • The LNT debate is better framed as a policy and risk management issue rather than a purely scientific one.
  • Incorporating social and economic impacts is crucial for effective radiation risk management.
  • Shifting the debate to policy necessitates a reduced role for scientists in policy decisions.