Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

06:04
Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
Current status of transcatheter aortic valve replacement
1St. Paul's and Vancouver General Hospitals, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. john.webb@vch.ca
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
|July 4, 2012
Summary
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a new standard for severe aortic stenosis patients unsuitable for surgery. TAVR may also benefit high-risk operable patients, with ongoing refinements expanding its appeal.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has historically been the primary treatment for severe aortic stenosis.
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is emerging as a leading alternative, especially for non-surgical candidates.
- TAVR offers potential benefits in reducing morbidity and mortality for select high-risk operable patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current role and evolving landscape of TAVR in managing severe aortic stenosis.
- To discuss the advantages and limitations of TAVR compared to SAVR.
- To highlight the importance of ongoing research and patient selection in TAVR therapy.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature and clinical trial data on TAVR and SAVR.
- Analysis of patient outcomes, including morbidity, mortality, and procedural complications.
- Discussion of technological advancements and future directions in transcatheter valve therapy.
Main Results:
- TAVR is the standard of care for symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis who are not candidates for SAVR.
- TAVR may be a preferred option over SAVR in carefully selected high-risk operable patients.
- While TAVR outcomes are improving, concerns regarding vascular injury, stroke, paravalvular regurgitation, and valve durability persist.
Conclusions:
- TAVR is becoming a more appealing option for a broader patient population due to ongoing refinements in systems, techniques, and patient selection.
- Randomized trials and surveillance are crucial for the rigorous clinical evaluation of minimally invasive structural heart disease therapies.
- The field is entering a new era of evidence-based assessment for TAVR and other transcatheter interventions.