Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024
Natrelle style 410 form-stable silicone breast implants: core study results at 6 years
G Patrick Maxwell1, Bruce W Van Natta, Diane K Murphy
1Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, California, USA. gpm@maxwellaesthetics.com
Background:
The Natrelle Style 410 shaped, form-stable silicone gel implant (Allergan, Inc; Irvine, California) has been the subject of a pivotal study that supports potential US Food and Drug Administration approval of the device. The 3-year results of this study were reported previously.
Objectives:
The authors update the safety and effectiveness findings for the Natrelle Style 410 implants through 6 years of study.
Methods:
This prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study included 941 patients (492 primary augmentations, 156 revision-augmentations, 225 primary reconstructions, and 68 revision-reconstructions). Since the original 3-year report, follow-up visits have been conducted annually. Kaplan-Meier risk rates were calculated for local complications, reoperations, and explantations. One-third of the subjects were enrolled in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cohort and underwent biannual MRI rupture screening. Effectiveness was measured by subject satisfaction on a 5-point scale.
Results:
As expected after breast implantation, capsular contracture (CC) was one of the most common complications, with 6-year risk rates of 4.6% for augmentation, 6.9% for revision-augmentation, 10.7% for reconstruction, and 18.3% for revision-reconstruction. The rates for CC among augmentations and revision-augmentations were significantly lower with the Natrelle 410 implants than with other standard gel implants. The rupture rate (confirmed plus suspected) across all cohorts was 6.4% by subject and 3.8% by implant. The most common reasons for reoperation were style or size change (augmentation), implant malposition (revision-augmentation), scarring (reconstruction), and CC (revision-reconstruction). The satisfaction rate exceeded 80% in all cohorts.
Conclusions:
These fifth-generation, form-stable implants represent another option to achieve desired aesthetic outcomes with minimal complications.
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Endoscopic Studies II: Thoracocentesis
Description
Excess pleural fluid or air may accumulate in some respiratory disorders in the thoracic cavity. To treat pleural effusion, a physician conducts thoracentesis by carefully piercing the chest wall and entering...
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
