Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multidose vial contamination in anesthesia.

M E Arrington, K C Gabbert, P W Mazgaj

    AANA Journal
    |December 1, 1990
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Health professions students as adolescent mentors in the Seattle (Wash.) schools.

    The Journal of school health·1999
    Same author

    Ten novel mutations found in Aniridia.

    Human mutation·1998
    Same author

    An anesthetic for the adult patient with congenital tracheoesophageal fistula: a case report.

    AANA journal·1994
    Same author

    The prevalence of symptoms in medical outpatients and the adequacy of therapy.

    Archives of internal medicine·1990
    Same author

    Predictive risk factors associated with stroke patient falls in acute care settings.

    The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses·1990
    Same journal

    <i>AANA Journal</i> Course-GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: What CRNAs Need to Know About Their Expanding Role.

    AANA journal·2026
    Same journal

    Resident Registered Nurse Anesthetists' Use of Cognitive Enhancers in the U.S.

    AANA journal·2026
    Same journal

    Exploring the Safety and Efficacy of Gabapentin Use In Perioperative Analgesia Protocols: An Integrative Review.

    AANA journal·2026
    Same journal

    Substance Use Behaviors and Perceived Stress Among Resident Registered Nurse Anesthetists.

    AANA journal·2026
    Same journal

    Exploring the Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions Among CRNAs.

    AANA journal·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluating the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjunct to Local Anesthetics in Adductor Canal Blocks for Adult Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    AANA journal·2026
    See all related articles

    Changing drug aspiration techniques significantly reduces multidose vial contamination. Using a new needle for each multidose vial entry prevents blood contamination, enhancing patient safety.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Microbiology
    • Anesthesiology
    • Infection Control

    Background:

    • Multidose vials (MDVs) are frequently used in healthcare settings.
    • Improper aseptic techniques during drug aspiration can lead to vial contamination.
    • Previous studies have highlighted the risk of cross-contamination from MDVs.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate if altering the drug aspiration technique impacts multidose vial contamination rates.
    • To assess the effectiveness of using a new needle for each vial entry in preventing contamination.

    Main Methods:

    • A comparative study design was employed with two groups: control (standard technique) and experimental (new needle per entry).
    • Guaiac testing (Hemoccult slides) was performed on samples from collected MDVs to detect occult blood contamination.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • A chi-square statistic was used to analyze the cumulative data for significant differences between groups.

    • Main Results:

    • The control group (standard technique) showed a contamination rate of 2.24% (11 out of 492 vials).
    • The experimental group (new needle per entry) demonstrated a significantly lower contamination rate of 0.27% (1 out of 369 vials).
    • The chi-square test confirmed a statistically significant difference (p < .05) in contamination rates between the two techniques.

    Conclusions:

    • Altering the drug aspiration technique by using a new needle for each multidose vial entry significantly reduces the incidence of blood contamination.
    • Occult blood contamination in used MDVs poses a risk of transmitting infectious agents between patients.
    • Implementing standardized protocols for needle use with MDVs is crucial for preventing healthcare-associated infections.