Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Working Memory Maintenance of Visual and Auditory Spatial Information Relies on Supramodal Neural Codes in the Dorsal Frontoparietal Cortex.

Brain sciences·2024
Same author

What, if anything, can be considered an amodal sensory dimension?

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024
Same author

Prokofiev was (almost) right: A cross-cultural investigation of auditory-conceptual associations in Peter and the Wolf.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024
Same author

Prevalence and predictors of binge eating disorder symptoms among a sample of university students in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional survey.

Health science reports·2023
Same author

More of me: Self-prioritization of numeric stimuli.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2023
Same author

Enhancing the design of wine labels.

Frontiers in psychology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Facilitating masked visual target identification with auditory oddball stimuli.

Mary Kim Ngo1, Charles Spence

  • 1Crossmodal Research Laboratory, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. mngo1028@gmail.com

Experimental Brain Research
|July 5, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Salient auditory oddball stimuli, including silence, enhance visual target identification when synchronized with the target. This suggests attentional capture, not multisensory integration, explains the

More Related Videos

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Auditory Perception
  • Visual Attention

Background:

  • Crossmodal attention research shows auditory stimuli can influence visual perception.
  • Previous studies demonstrated that auditory oddballs improve visual target identification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of different auditory oddball conditions on visual target identification.
  • To determine if attentional capture or multisensory integration best explains crossmodal facilitation.

Main Methods:

  • Participants identified visual targets amidst distractors under three auditory oddball conditions: louder tone, quieter tone, and silence.
  • Experiments involved synchronized auditory and visual stimuli.
  • Performance was measured by visual target identification accuracy.

Main Results:

  • All three auditory oddball conditions (deviating loudness or silence) significantly improved visual target identification.
  • The effect was observed across three separate experiments.
  • Silence as an oddball stimulus also facilitated performance.

Conclusions:

  • Salient auditory oddball stimuli, including deviations in loudness and the absence of sound, capture attention.
  • This attentional capture, synchronized with the visual target, enhances visual identification.
  • An attentional capture model is proposed over multisensory integration to explain these findings.