Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the cochlea, a...
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by identifying...
Perception of Sound Waves01:01

Perception of Sound Waves

The human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies in the audible range. It may perceive sound waves with the same pressure but different frequencies as having different loudness. Moreover, the perception of sound waves depends on the health of an individual's ears, which decays with age. The health of one's ears may also be affected by regular exposure to loud noises.
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same frequency...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The meaningfulness of searching for minimal exposure duration to understand visual perception.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Perceptual learning without feedback is accompanied with systematic changes in confidence processing.

Neuroscience of consciousness·2026
Same author

When is "now"? In the past to compensate for the sensation of time or in the future as a prediction of the temporal sensory horizon?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

When one race is not enough: A relay model explains multisensory response times.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Natural scene segmentation dynamics reveal iterative Bayesian inference.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Low confidence for perceptual completion of partially occluded objects.

Journal of vision·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Noise and correlations in parallel perceptual decision making.

Thomas U Otto1, Pascal Mamassian

  • 1Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75006 Paris, France. tom.u.otto@gmail.com

Current Biology : CB
|July 10, 2012
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals that multisensory decisions accumulate evidence separately for each sense, not integrated beforehand. This parallel processing, influenced by noise, explains decision speed and variability.

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Decision-Making Science
  • Sensory Processing

Background:

  • Perceptual decisions rely on accumulating noisy sensory evidence over time.
  • Existing models often assume multisensory signals integrate before a single decision.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate parallel processing of distinct signals from different sensory modalities (vision, audition).
  • To challenge the assumption of pre-decisional integration of multisensory information.
  • To elucidate the mechanisms underlying multisensory decision-making and response latencies.

Main Methods:

  • Extended decision-making frameworks to crossmodal research.
  • Analyzed the separate accumulation of evidence for visual and auditory signals.
  • Investigated the coupling of decisions through logical operations.

Main Results:

  • Evidence is accumulated separately for each sensory signal, not integrated prior to decision.
  • Decisions are flexibly coupled by logical operations.
  • Trial-to-trial response latency correlations are crucial for explaining short multisensory decision latencies.
  • Increased noise in multisensory decisions is necessary to explain observed response latencies and their variability.

Conclusions:

  • Multisensory decisions involve parallel evidence accumulation, not unified pre-decisional integration.
  • Flexible logical coupling of separate decisions is key.
  • Understanding noise and latency correlations is fundamental for parallel multisensory decision processes.