Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is there a role for image science in the brave new world of artificial intelligence?

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2021
Same author

Erratum: Publisher's Note: Stochastic models for objects and images in oncology and virology: application to PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling and COVID-19 disease.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2021
Same author

Stochastic models for objects and images in oncology and virology: application to PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling and COVID-19 disease.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2020
Same author

Radiance and photon noise: imaging in geometrical optics, physical optics, quantum optics and radiology.

Optical engineering (Redondo Beach, Calif.)·2020
Same author

Objective assessment of the effects of tumor motion in radiation therapy.

Medical physics·2019
Same author

Physiological random processes in precision cancer therapy.

PloS one·2018
Same journal

Long-term stabilization of intensity-difference squeezing from four-wave mixing in rubidium vapor.

Optics express·2026
Same journal

Robust 3D topography measurement of large-range high-aspect-ratio structures based on dual-domain statistical filtering in SD-OCT.

Optics express·2026
Same journal

Broadband transmissive terahertz metasurface for simultaneous quad-mode OAM multiplexing.

Optics express·2026
Same journal

Leveraging two-dimensional materials for high-sensitivity optical sensors: quasi-bound states in the continuum within hybrid metasurfaces.

Optics express·2026
Same journal

Resolution investigation for dual-spherical-wave optical scanning holographic microscopy: methods and performance.

Optics express·2026
Same journal

Robustness of parallel subnetwork-filtered diffractive deep neural networks.

Optics express·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping
09:43

Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping

Published on: March 20, 2017

Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameterized wavefronts from multifocal data.

Julia A Sakamoto1, Harrison H Barrett

  • 1College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA. jsakamoto@nikonrca.com

Optics Express
|July 10, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study demonstrates a novel method for determining optical system pupil phase distribution using likelihood estimation. The technique successfully reconstructs wavefronts, even with significant aberrations, in both simulations and experiments.

More Related Videos

Lens-free Video Microscopy for the Dynamic and Quantitative Analysis of Adherent Cell Culture
09:04

Lens-free Video Microscopy for the Dynamic and Quantitative Analysis of Adherent Cell Culture

Published on: February 23, 2018

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping
09:43

Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping

Published on: March 20, 2017

Lens-free Video Microscopy for the Dynamic and Quantitative Analysis of Adherent Cell Culture
09:04

Lens-free Video Microscopy for the Dynamic and Quantitative Analysis of Adherent Cell Culture

Published on: February 23, 2018

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Optical Engineering
  • Wavefront Sensing
  • Computational Optics

Background:

  • Accurate pupil phase distribution is critical for optical system performance.
  • Traditional wavefront sensing methods can be limited by aberrations or computational complexity.
  • Estimating wavefronts from irradiance data requires robust algorithms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate a new method for determining pupil phase distribution.
  • To estimate wavefront expansion coefficients using likelihood methods.
  • To validate the method through simulation and experimental data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized likelihood methods for estimating wavefront coefficients from near-focus irradiance patterns.
  • Employed simulated annealing to address local extrema in the likelihood function for Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimates.
  • Investigated Fisher information matrices and Cramér-Rao bounds.
  • Applied rapid processing techniques to enhance computational efficiency.

Main Results:

  • Proof-of-principle results were achieved in both simulated and experimental setups.
  • The method demonstrated capability in handling large-aberration wavefronts numerically.
  • Nuisance parameters were effectively managed in the experimental phase.
  • ML estimates were successfully obtained despite complex likelihood surfaces.

Conclusions:

  • The demonstrated method provides a viable approach for pupil phase distribution determination.
  • The technique is robust and applicable to systems with significant aberrations.
  • Computational efficiency was improved through rapid processing techniques.