Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026
2D and 3D Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Based Models to Dissect Primary Cilium Involvement during Neocortical Development
Published on: March 25, 2022
Evidence for structural plasticity in humans: comment on Thomas and Baker (2012)
1University of Pittsburgh, USA. kiericks@pitt.edu
This review discusses brain plasticity, examining evidence that training can change brain structure. It highlights the need for careful consideration of methods and potential confounding factors in this research area.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
Background:
- A review by Thomas and Baker (2012) critically assessed evidence for training-induced structural brain plasticity.
- This commentary offers further considerations for interpreting such research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide additional insights into the interpretation of scientific literature on structural brain plasticity.
- To emphasize methodological rigor and potential moderating factors in brain plasticity research.
Main Methods:
- Critical analysis of existing scientific literature and reviews.
- Discussion of methodological challenges in studying structural brain plasticity.
Main Results:
- The field requires careful circumspection due to methodological complexities.
- Potential for significant implications if human structural brain plasticity is confirmed.
Conclusions:
- Interpreting research on training-induced brain structure changes demands attention to methodological details.
- Further rigorous research is needed to confirm and understand human structural brain plasticity.
More Related Videos
09:51Recording Synaptic Plasticity in Acute Hippocampal Slices Maintained in a Small-volume Recycling-, Perfusion-, and Submersion-type Chamber System
Published on: January 1, 2018
12:47Inducing Plasticity of Astrocytic Receptors by Manipulation of Neuronal Firing Rates
Published on: March 20, 2014