Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

08:27
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
The heritability of foreign policy preferences
Skyler J Cranmer1, Christopher T Dawes
1Department of Political Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3265, USA. Skyler@unc.edu
Summary
Genetic factors significantly influence foreign policy attitudes, suggesting a biological basis for hawkish or dovish stances. Political ideology may mediate the link between genes and foreign policy preferences.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral genetics
- Political psychology
- Social sciences
Background:
- Traditional explanations for foreign policy attitudes focus on ideology and demographics.
- A gap exists in understanding the biological underpinnings of foreign policy preferences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the extent to which genetic variation influences foreign policy attitudes.
- To explore the relationship between genetic factors, political ideology, and foreign policy preferences.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the Minnesota Twin Family Study.
- Employed a bivariate twin model to analyze genetic influences.
Main Results:
- A moderate proportion of individual differences in foreign policy preferences (hawkish/dovish) is attributable to genetic variation.
- Foreign policy preferences share a common genetic source with political ideology.
Conclusions:
- Genetic factors play a role in shaping foreign policy attitudes.
- Political ideology may act as a mediating pathway for genetic influences on foreign policy preferences.
Related Concept Videos
Heritability
Heritability is a statistical concept that measures the degree to which genetic differences among individuals contribute to trait variations within a population. It is a fundamental idea in genetics, often prone to misinterpretation. Heritability is expressed as a percentage, reflecting the proportion of variation in a specific trait across a population that can be linked to genetic differences. However, it's important to understand that heritability does not determine how "genetic" a trait is,...
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
Behavior genetics explores how genetic inheritance influences human behavior. It focuses on how genes, passed from parents to offspring, contribute to the development of behavioral traits and tendencies. This branch of genetics seeks to understand the complex interplay between inherited genetic factors and environmental influences in shaping our behaviors.
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
Surveys
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
Social Proof
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
Fundamental Attribution Error
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...

