Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Electrode placements for cochlear implants: a review.

S Rosen1

  • 1Department of Phonetics and Linguistics, University College London, UK.

British Journal of Audiology
|December 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The ScanDeNi process could turn an existing under-performing activated sludge plant into an asset.

Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research·2003
Same author

Clinical management of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia as diagnosed by extended needle biopsies.

BJU international·2003
Same author

Surgical management of benign tumors of the liver.

International journal of gastrointestinal cancer·2003
Same author

Dermatitis in humans associated with the mites Pyemotes tritici, Dermanyssus gallinae, Ornithonyssus bacoti and Androlaelaps casalis in Israel.

Medical and veterinary entomology·2003
Same author

Mortality of patients with childhood onset (0-17 years) Type I diabetes in Israel: a population-based study.

Diabetologia·2001
Same author

Renal effects of nabumetone, a COX-2 antagonist: impairment of function in isolated perfused rat kidneys contrasts with preserved renal function in vivo.

Experimental nephrology·2001
Same journal

Effects of slow- and fast-acting compression on the detection of gaps in narrow bands of noise.

British journal of audiology·2002
Same journal

Measurement of first- and second-order modulation detection thresholds in listeners with cochlear hearing loss.

British journal of audiology·2002
Same journal

Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally.

British journal of audiology·2002
Same journal

Assessing service quality in paediatric audiology and early deaf education.

British journal of audiology·2002
Same journal

Comparison of the electroacoustic characteristics of five hearing aids.

British journal of audiology·2002
Same journal

Use of the 'real-ear to dial difference' to derive real-ear SPL from hearing level obtained with insert earphones.

British journal of audiology·2002
See all related articles

Cochlear implant electrode placement has evolved, with round window sites favored for single-channel devices. For multichannel implants, intra-cochlear electrodes are generally superior, though extra-cochlear approaches may aid apical cochlear access.

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Neurosurgery

Background:

  • Cochlear implant surgery involves diverse electrode placement strategies.
  • Current widespread use is limited to two primary approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different cochlear implant electrode insertion sites.
  • To compare intra-cochlear versus extra-cochlear electrode placement for multichannel devices.
  • To consider special patient populations, including adults with residual hearing and children.

Main Methods:

  • Review of clinical outcomes associated with various cochlear implant electrode insertion sites.
  • Comparative analysis of single-channel and multichannel cochlear implant electrode performance.
  • Assessment of risks and benefits of intra-cochlear versus extra-cochlear placements.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Round window placement is effective for single-channel cochlear implants.
  • Intra-cochlear electrodes are generally preferred for multichannel cochlear implants over extra-cochlear options.
  • Extra-cochlear approaches may offer benefits for accessing the cochlear apex.

Conclusions:

  • Electrode site selection for cochlear implants depends on device type and patient factors.
  • Intra-cochlear placement is safe and effective for multichannel cochlear implants.
  • Further research may explore combined intra- and extra-cochlear strategies for optimal outcomes.