Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026
3D Cine Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Respiratory Motion in Mechanically Ventilated Mice and Rats
Published on: September 19, 2025
Bortezomib partially protects the rat diaphragm from ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction
Anouk Agten1, Karen Maes, Debby Thomas
1Respiratory Muscle Research Unit, Laboratory of Pneumology and Respiratory Division, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Objective:
Controlled mechanical ventilation leads to diaphragmatic contractile dysfunction and atrophy. Since proteolysis is enhanced in the diaphragm during controlled mechanical ventilation, we examined whether the administration of a proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, would have a protective effect against ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction.
Design:
Randomized, controlled experiment.
Settings:
Basic science animal laboratory.
Interventions:
Anesthetized rats were submitted for 24 hrs to controlled mechanical ventilation while receiving 0.05 mg/kg bortezomib or saline. Control rats were acutely anesthetized.
Measurements And Main Results:
After 24 hrs, diaphragm force production was significantly lower in mechanically ventilated animals receiving an injection of saline compared to control animals (-36%, p<.001). Importantly, administration of bortezomib improved the diaphragmatic force compared to mechanically ventilated animals receiving an injection of saline (+15%, p<.01), but force did not return to control levels. Compared to control animals, diaphragm cross-sectional area of the type IIx/b fibers was significantly decreased by 28% in mechanically ventilated animals receiving an injection of saline (p<.01) and by 16% in mechanically ventilated animals receiving an injection of bortezomib (p<.05). Diaphragmatic calpain activity was significantly increased in mechanically ventilated animals receiving an injection of saline (+52%, p<.05) and in mechanically ventilated animals receiving an injection of bortezomib (+36%, p<.05). Caspase-3 activity was increased after controlled mechanical ventilation with saline by 55% (p<.05), while it remained similar to control animals in mechanically ventilated animals receiving an injection of bortezomib. Diaphragm 20S proteasome activity was slightly increased in both ventilated groups, and the amount of ubiquitinated proteins was significantly and similarly enhanced in mechanically ventilated animals receiving an injection of saline and mechanically ventilated animals receiving an injection of bortezomib.
Conclusions:
These data show that the administration of bortezomib partially protects the diaphragm from controlled mechanical ventilation-induced diaphragm contractile dysfunction without preventing atrophy. The fact that calpain activity was still increased after bortezomib treatment may explain the persistence of atrophy. Part of bortezomib effects might have been due to its ability to inhibit caspase-3 in this model.
