Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Multiple testing in candidate gene situations: a comparison of classical, discrete, and resampling-based procedures
Amelie Elsäβer1, Anja Victor, Gerhard Hommel
1University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics..
Multiple testing procedures for correlated SNP data show varying performance based on sample size. The minP-resampling method offers higher power in small samples, while FDR procedures are more effective with larger sample sizes.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Statistical genetics
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Candidate gene association studies often involve testing multiple hypotheses simultaneously on partially correlated SNP data.
- Accounting for multiple testing is crucial, with various procedures proposed to control error rates.
- The benefit of discrete-aware multiple testing procedures for correlated data remains an open question.
Purpose of the Study:
- To empirically evaluate the performance of different multiple testing procedures using simulated correlated SNP data.
- To compare False Discovery Rate (FDR) and Family-Wise Error Rate (FWER) controlling procedures, including those for discrete situations and minP-resampling.
- To investigate the impact of sample size and gene data scenarios on procedure performance.
Main Methods:
- Simulation studies were conducted using simulated SNP data with varying degrees of correlation.
- Multiple testing procedures evaluated include FDR controllers, FWER controllers, discrete situation procedures, and minP-resampling.
- Performance was assessed across a broad range of gene data scenarios and sample sizes.
Main Results:
- Sample size was the primary factor influencing the performance of multiple testing procedures.
- In small sample size scenarios, the minP-resampling procedure demonstrated higher statistical power than classical FDR procedures, despite controlling the stricter FWER.
- In larger sample size scenarios, FDR controlling procedures resulted in a greater number of significant rejections.
Conclusions:
- The choice of multiple testing procedure significantly impacts results in candidate gene association studies with correlated SNP data.
- The minP-resampling procedure is advantageous in small sample settings for its power, while FDR procedures are more potent with larger sample sizes.
- These findings highlight the importance of considering sample size when selecting multiple testing strategies for genetic association studies.
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Cochran's Q Test
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Test for Homogeneity
Bonferroni Test
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
Significance Testing: Overview
