Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation
Published on: September 4, 2017
Comparison of different methods of calculating CT radiation effective dose in children
Beverley Newman1, Arundhuti Ganguly, Jee-Eun Kim
1Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, 725 Welch Rd, Rm 1677, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. bev.newman@stanford.edu
Insights
Calculating effective dose in pediatric CT scans shows significant variation between methods. Standardizing these calculations is crucial for accurate radiation dose reporting and research in children undergoing CT.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Radiology
- Pediatric Imaging
Background:
- CT radiation dose is a significant concern in pediatric patients.
- Effective dose calculation methods lack standardization, leading to variability.
- Accurate dose assessment is vital for pediatric CT examinations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare five different methods for calculating effective dose in pediatric chest CT.
- To explore the advantages and disadvantages of each calculation method.
- To highlight the impact of varying calculation methods on pediatric radiation dose reporting.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 120 pediatric chest CT examinations.
- Calculation of effective dose using five distinct methods: Shrimpton DLP, Deak DLP, ImPact calculator, Alessio online calculator, and Huda method.
- Comparison of results against the Shrimpton DLP method as a reference standard.
Main Results:
- The Huda method (4.4 ± 2.2 mSv) and Alessio online calculator (5.2 ± 2.8 mSv) reported higher effective doses than DLP methods and the ImPact calculator.
- Mean differences in effective dose ranged from 10.2% lower to 28% higher compared to the Shrimpton method.
- Calculation results varied based on kilovoltage peak (kVp) and patient age, with notable differences at 120 kVp.
Conclusions:
- Discrepancies in effective dose calculations among different methods are significant for pediatric CT.
- Clear documentation of the chosen calculation method is essential for consistent dose reporting.
- Standardization is needed to reduce confusion in dose archiving and comparative pediatric research.
Objective:
CT radiation dose is a subject of intense interest and concern, especially in children. Effective dose, a summation of whole-body exposure weighted by specific organ sensitivities, is most often used to compute and compare radiation dose; however, there is little standardization, and there are numerous different methods of calculating effective dose. This study compares five such methods in a group of children undergoing routine chest CT and explores their advantages and pitfalls.
Materials And Methods:
Patient data from 120 pediatric chest CT examinations were retrospectively used to calculate effective dose: two scanner dose-length product (DLP) methods using published sets of conversion factors by Shrimpton and Deak, the imaging performance and assessment of CT (ImPact) calculator method, the Alessio online calculator, and the Huda method.
Results:
The Huda method mean effective dose (4.4 ± 2.2 mSv) and Alessio online calculator (5.2 ± 2.8 mSv) yielded higher mean numbers for effective dose than both DLP calculations (Shrimpton, 3.65 ± 1.8 mSv, and Deak, 3.2 ± 1.5 mSv) as well as the ImPact calculator effective dose (3.4 ± 1.7 mSv). Mean differences ranged from 10.2% ± 10.1% lower to 28% ± 37.3% higher than the Shrimpton method (used as the standard for comparison). Differences were more marked at 120 kVp than at 80 or 100 kVp and varied at different ages. Concordance coefficients relative to the Shrimpton DLP method were Deak DLP, 0.907; Alessio online calculator, 0.735; ImPact calculator, 0.926; and Huda, 0.777.
Conclusion:
Different methods of computing effective dose for pediatric CT produce varying results. The method used must be clearly described to allay confusion about documenting and communicating dose for archiving as well as comparative research purposes.
Related Concept Videos
Biological Effects of Radiation
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
