Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
Published on: February 2, 2020
Assessing readability formula differences with written health information materials: application, results, and
Lih-Wern Wang1, Michael J Miller, Michael R Schmitt
1College of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma, 4502 East 41st Street, Tulsa, OK 74135, USA.
The Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) readability formula is most consistent for health information. Reporting methods for reading grade level estimates should include sample size and calculation details for better interpretation.
Area of Science:
- Health literacy
- Medical writing
- Health communication
Background:
- Readability formulas guide health information development but yield variable results.
- Inconsistent application and interpretation complicate reading grade level estimates.
- Lack of uniform guidelines hinders effective use of readability formulas.
Purpose of the Study:
- Identify common readability formulas in healthcare literature.
- Apply and compare formulas to health information on depression.
- Provide recommendations for selecting appropriate readability formulas.
Main Methods:
- Literature search for prevalent readability formulas.
- Applied selected formulas to 15 health information texts on depression.
- Compared formula estimates based on text sample, formatting, and calculation methods.
Main Results:
- Flesch-Kincaid was the most used formula (57.42%).
- Readability formulas showed up to 5 grade level variability on identical texts.
- The Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) demonstrated the most consistency.
Conclusions:
- SMOG formula is recommended for healthcare due to consistency and ease of use.
- Reporting should include sample size, text location, formatting, and calculation method.
- Standardized reporting improves readability interpretation for health materials.
Related Concept Videos
Health Literacy
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
