The transfer of adaptation between actual and simulated rotary stimulation

It is well known that continued exposure to motion environments leads to adaptation, but it is not clear whether such changes are specific to the particular type of motion experienced. The present investigation sought to evaluate the extent of transfer between real motion and visually-induced apparent motion. In addition, the direction of motion was varied and these two factors, mode of exposure and direction of rotation, were examined in a cross-adaptational design. Thirty-two subjects were pre- and posttested on measures of disorientation after active bodily rotation and visually-induced self-vection. Two groups received ten consecutive trials of active bodily rotation (clockwise or counter-clockwise) for 4 consecutive days. Two other groups received ten consecutive trials of visually-induced self-vection (clockwise or counter-clockwise) in a rotating drum for 4 consecutive days. During the exposure phase, dizziness and self-vection increased over trials for the groups exposed to the drum, while dizziness remained unchanged over trials for the groups exposed to bodily rotation. Repeated exposure to bodily rotation resulted in improved walking performance over trials and days. Subjects exposed to bodily rotation exhibited increased tolerance to visually-induced self-vection; however, exposure to visually-induced self-vection did not result in greater tolerance to bodily rotation. No support for directional specificity was evident.