Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Ye's Swing Technique for Small-incision Lenticule Extraction Surgery
Published on: June 27, 2025
LASIK interface complications: etiology, management, and outcomes
J Bradley Randleman1, Rupa D Shah
1Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. jrandle@emory.edu
Purpose:
To describe the etiology, diagnosis, clinical course, and management of LASIK interface complications.
Methods:
Literature review.
Results:
Primary interface complications include infectious keratitis, diffuse lamellar keratitis, central toxic keratopathy, pressure-induced stromal keratopathy (PISK), and epithelial ingrowth. Infectious keratitis is most commonly caused by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (early onset) or atypical Mycobacterium (late onset) postoperatively, and immediate treatment includes flap lift and irrigation, cultures, and initiation of broad-spectrum topical antibiotics, with possible flap amputation for recalcitrant cases. Diffuse lamellar keratitis is a white blood cell infiltrate that appears within the first 5 days postoperatively and is acutely responsive to aggressive topical and oral steroid use in the early stages, but may require flap lift and irrigation to prevent flap necrosis if inflammation worsens. In contrast, PISK is caused by acute steroid response and resolves only with cessation of steroid use and intraocular pressure lowering. Without appropriate therapy PISK can result in severe optic nerve damage. Central toxic keratopathy mimics stage 4 diffuse lamellar keratitis, but occurs early in the postoperative period and is noninflammatory. Observation is the only effective treatment, and flap lift is usually not warranted. Epithelial ingrowth is easily distinguishable from other interface complications and may be self-limited or require flap lift to treat irregular astigmatism and prevent flap melt.
Conclusions:
Differentiating between interface entities is critical to rapid appropriate diagnosis, treatment, and ultimate visual outcome. Although initial presentations may overlap significantly, the conditions can be readily distinguished with close follow-up, and most complications can resolve without significant visual sequelae when treated appropriately.
Insights
LASIK interface complications like keratitis and epithelial ingrowth require prompt diagnosis. Differentiating these conditions is key for appropriate treatment and preserving visual outcomes after laser eye surgery.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Refractive Surgery
- Corneal Surgery
Background:
- Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is a common refractive surgery.
- Interface complications can arise post-LASIK, potentially impacting visual outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To detail the causes, diagnosis, clinical progression, and management strategies for LASIK interface complications.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature review was conducted.
Main Results:
- Key complications include infectious keratitis, diffuse lamellar keratitis, central toxic keratopathy, pressure-induced stromal keratopathy (PISK), and epithelial ingrowth.
- Each complication has distinct etiologies, diagnostic features, and treatment protocols, ranging from antibiotics and steroids to flap manipulation or observation.
- Prompt and accurate differentiation is crucial, as PISK can lead to optic nerve damage and untreated keratitis can cause significant visual loss.
Conclusions:
- Distinguishing between LASIK interface complications is vital for timely diagnosis and effective management.
- While presentations may overlap, careful follow-up allows for differentiation, leading to appropriate treatment and minimizing long-term visual impairment.
Related Concept Videos
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Glaucoma: Overview
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Focusing of Light in the Eye