Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026
Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
[Clinical effects of surgical vs manual reduction of ankle fractures]
Yi-Fei Zhou1, Yang Yu, Xiao-Lei Zhang
1Department of Orthopaedics, the Second Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou 325027, Zhejiang, China. zhouyifei_w2@163.com
Objective:
To investigate the clinical effects of surgical vs manual reduction of ankle fractures.
Methods:
From March 2006 to April 2010,301 patients with ankle fractures were analyzed retrospectively, of whom 134 patients were treated by manual reduction and plaster fixation, and the other 167 patients underwent surgical treatment. In manual reduction group, there were 86 males and 48 females with a mean age of (38.2 +/- 15.7) years, involving Weber-Denis A in 55 cases,Weber-Denis B in 60 cases, and Weber-Denis C in 19 cases. In surgical reduction group, there were 115 males and 52 females with a mean age of (39.6 +/- 11.9) years, involving Weber-Denis A in 59 cases, Weber-Denis B in 52 cases and Weber-Denis C in 56 cases. The score of the ankle's symptoms and function was calculated according to Mazur,and the difference was analyzed by Chi-squire test.
Results:
Of the 114 patients with Weber-Denis A, 55 patients were in manual reduction group, with excellent, good, acceptable and poor results in 18, 20, 11 and 6 patients respectively vs 26, 25, 6 and 2 in surgical reduction group of 59 patients. In patients with Weber-Denis B, there were 60 patients in manual reduction group, with excellent, good, acceptable and poor results in 20 , 26, 8 and 6 patients vs 25, 21, 5, and 1 in surgical reduction group of 52 patients. There was no significant difference in clinical effects between the two group of Weber-Denis A and B. The remaining 75 patients belonged to Weber-Denis C, of whom 19 patients were in manual reduction group,with excellent, good, acceptable and poor results in 2, 3, 7 and 7 patients vs 21, 18, 11 and 6 in surgical reduction group of 56 patients. There was no significant difference in clinical effects between the two groups of Weber-Denis C (P=0.007).
Conclusion:
The clinical effect of surgical reduction group was obviously better than that of manual reduction group for Weber-Denis C, and therefore surgical intervention is recommended for this type of fracture.
