Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Case Studies01:22

Case Studies

There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Group Therapy01:26

Group Therapy

Group therapy is a sociocultural approach to psychological treatment, where individuals with shared psychological challenges come together under the guidance of a mental health professional. This therapeutic modality offers unique opportunities for individuals to connect, share, and grow within the context of a supportive group. By fostering mutual understanding and collaboration, group therapy can address a range of psychological concerns effectively, often complementing or surpassing the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Persistent physical symptoms not explained by structural abnormalities or disease processes: a primary care approach to promote recovery.

Scandinavian journal of primary health care·2026
Same author

Conducting evidence synthesis and developing evidence-based advice in public health and beyond: A scoping review and map of methods guidance.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same author

Problematic substance use in the family: professionals' and adolescents' perspectives on identification and help. A qualitative study.

Scandinavian journal of public health·2026
Same author

Informed decisions about public health and social measures.

Health research policy and systems·2025
Same author

Raising complex public health challenges on local government agendas: a Norwegian case study.

Health research policy and systems·2025
Same author

Changes in physical activity among overweight and obese Norwegian children aged 6-12: A non-randomized cluster-controlled trial.

Scandinavian journal of public health·2025
Same journal

Cohort profile: Sheyang Mini Birth Cohort Study (SMBCS).

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

Quebec lung, liver and heart transplant recipients' perspectives on self-narratives and their experiences in creative writing workshops during the transplantation journey: a qualitative study.

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

Impact of climatic variables on postoperative outcomes in various surgical disciplines: a systematic review.

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

ADHD and cardiometabolic risk profile in adults with type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal register-based study.

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

Understanding the impact of the follow-up period on the association between excess body weight, and cardiovascular events and mortality: a prospective cohort study of the UK Biobank.

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

Temporal associations between incident physical health problems/sensory impairments and challenging behaviours in people with intellectual disabilities: a population-based longitudinal cohort study of primary care in England.

BMJ open·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

Case stories in general practice: a focus group study.

Eirik Abildsnes1, Signe Flottorp, Per Stensland

  • 1Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

BMJ Open
|August 10, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sharing case stories in small groups helps general practice doctors reflect on patient care and ethical issues. This peer interaction fosters mutual support and deeper understanding in a safe environment.

More Related Videos

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Qualitative Research
  • General Practice

Background:

  • General practice doctors often face complex patient cases.
  • Peer-group discussions are valuable for professional development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the interactive process of sharing case stories in small-group settings within general practice.

Main Methods:

  • A qualitative focus group study was conducted.
  • Participants included 50 general practitioners (20 female, 30 male) in Norway.
  • Meetings were peer-group sessions for specialist training or continuing medical education.

Main Results:

  • Case story sharing involved detailed narratives with emotional engagement, co-authored by group members.
  • Discussions and reflections covered patient/doctor perspectives, medical ethics, and clinical challenges.
  • A safe group atmosphere enabled exploration of socially shared knowledge boundaries.

Conclusions:

  • Sharing case stories in small general practice groups stimulated interaction.
  • This process facilitated meaning-making, reflection, and peer support among doctors.