Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hysteresis effects in visual and auditory perception and the comparison of underlying neural mechanisms - an EEG study.

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

Bridging cognition and control through passive eye movement integration in motor imagery brain-computer interfaces.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
Same author

Isolated sequence learning in the visual and motor domain.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

Expertise-dependent mental representation in chess: evaluation and comparisons based on structural dimensional analysis-motoric.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Inverse hysteresis effects in a real and virtual environment.

Frontiers in sports and active living·2026
Same author

Test-Retest Reliability, Parallel Test Reliability, and Internal Consistency of Balance Assessments in Young Healthy Adults.

Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology·2025
Same journal

Effects of lumbar disc injury and nociception on trunk motor control during rat locomotion.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Changes in synergy formation and modulation during cyclic finger force production tasks in female adults with dystonic cerebral palsy.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Molecular links between reelin downregulation, topoisomerase IIβ alterations, and proteins involved in Alzheimer pathology in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Exploring Sevoflurane promotes hippocampal neuron mitophagy in elderly postoperative cognitive dysfunction by HSP90AA1 based on network pharmacology.

Experimental brain research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors
15:00

The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors

Published on: May 2, 2021

Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.

Christian Seegelke1, Charmayne M L Hughes, Christoph Schütz

  • 1Neurocognition and Action Research Group, Faculty of Psychology and Sport Sciences, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany. christian.seegelke@uni-bielefeld.de

Experimental Brain Research
|August 14, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Humans plan movements considering future comfort, optimizing motor control. This study shows how end-state comfort influences grasp selection in multi-step tasks, impacting preceding actions.

More Related Videos

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors
15:00

The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors

Published on: May 2, 2021

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Motor control and cognitive neuroscience
  • Human-computer interaction
  • Biomechanics and ergonomics

Background:

  • Humans often adopt initial awkward movements if they lead to more comfortable final postures.
  • This end-state comfort effect suggests anticipatory planning of future body states.
  • Understanding this effect is crucial for designing intuitive human-robot interactions and assistive technologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how the final goal of a task influences motor planning of earlier segments.
  • To determine if grasp postures are planned to optimize end-state comfort in a multi-segment action.
  • To explore the continuous range of grasp postures available to participants.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a three-segment action: opening a drawer, grasping an object, and placing it on a table.
  • The object placement required one of three target orientations (0°, 90°, or 180° rotation).
  • Grasp postures and movement segments were analyzed to assess planning strategies.

Main Results:

  • Initial grasp postures (drawer opening) were not affected by the final object orientation.
  • Intermediate (grasping) and final (placing) movement segments were significantly influenced by the target orientation.
  • For a 180° rotation task, 42% prioritized intermediate comfort, while 58% prioritized end-state comfort.

Conclusions:

  • Motor planning adapts to optimize task completion, with constraint selection influenced by context.
  • End-state comfort is a significant factor in motor planning, especially for complex actions.
  • The balance between immediate and future comfort influences strategy selection in human movement.