Related Experiment Videos
Self-incrimination and denial in the juvenile transfer evaluation
1Boston Juvenile Court Clinic, MA.
The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
|January 1, 1990
Summary
Juvenile court evaluations for adult transfer pose challenges for clinicians managing incriminating statements. Addressing these issues requires procedural compromises to balance legal and clinical needs.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Psychiatry
- Juvenile Justice
Background:
- Clinical evaluations for juvenile transfer to adult court precede case adjudication.
- This timing creates challenges for managing potentially incriminating information disclosed by defendants.
Observation:
- Both self-incriminating statements and denials of culpability present management difficulties.
- Existing procedural protections for self-incrimination are insufficient.
- Interpreting denials of culpability in this forensic context is complex.
Findings:
- Current procedures do not fully resolve the dilemmas faced by psychiatric consultants.
- The evaluation process can compromise the defendant's legal rights.
- Forensic interpretation of denials is clinically and legally problematic.
Implications:
- Procedural compromises are needed to navigate the juvenile court jurisdiction boundary.
- Better frameworks are required for handling sensitive information in juvenile transfer evaluations.
- This highlights a critical tension between clinical assessment and legal proceedings.