Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

A Retrograde Implantation Approach for Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement in Mice
Published on: July 20, 2022
Cardiovascular implantable electronic device leads in CKD and ESRD patients: review and recommendations for practice
Theodore F Saad1, Dirk M Hentschel, Bruce Koplan
1Department of Medicine, Section of Renal and Hypertensive Diseases, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware, USA. tsaad@delawarekidney.com
Insights
Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in kidney disease patients pose risks like vein stenosis and infection. Alternative lead placement may reduce these complications, improving patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are vital for managing cardiac arrhythmias in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis.
- The survival advantage of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for primary prevention in CKD/ESRD patients is less defined than in the general population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review complications associated with transvenous CIED leads in hemodialysis patients.
- To explore alternative CIED lead strategies for mitigating risks in this population.
- To provide consensus recommendations for managing CIED and arteriovenous access complications.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and analysis of existing data on CIED complications in renal disease.
- Evaluation of the impact of transvenous leads on central vein stenosis and arteriovenous access.
- Assessment of infection rates and outcomes in patients with renal disease and CIEDs.
Main Results:
- Transvenous CIED leads are linked to central vein stenosis, complicating arteriovenous access and potentially requiring interventions.
- Patients with renal disease experience higher rates of CIED lead infections with poorer outcomes.
- Epicardial or nontransvenous CIED leads may decrease risks of central venous stenosis and infection.
Conclusions:
- Transvenous CIED leads present significant risks for hemodialysis patients, including central vein stenosis and infection.
- Alternative CIED lead technologies, such as epicardial leads, warrant consideration to reduce complications.
- Management strategies for CIED and hemodialysis access complications are crucial for this patient group.
Abstract:
Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are frequently utilized for management of cardiac dysrhythmias in patients with chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis. The survival benefit from use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients with CKD or ESRD is not as clear as in the general population, particularly when used for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Transvenous CIED leads are associated with central vein stenosis resulting in significant adverse consequences for existing or future arteriovenous access. Venous hypertension from CIED lead-related central vein stenosis is a challenging clinical problem and may require repeated percutaneous interventions, replacement of the CIED, or creation of alternative arteriovenous access. Infections associated with transvenous CIED leads are more frequent and associated with worse outcomes in patients with renal disease. Epicardial CIED leads or other nontransvenous devices may reduce complications of both central venous stenosis and endovascular infection in these vulnerable patients. Consensus recommendations are offered for avoidance and management of complications arising from the use of CIEDs and arteriovenous hemodialysis access.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy

