Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Novel Apparatus and Method for Drug Reinforcement
Published on: August 20, 2010
Using pay for performance to improve treatment implementation for adolescent substance use disorders: results from a
Bryan R Garner1, Susan H Godley, Michael L Dennis
1Lighthouse Institute, Chestnut Health Systems, Normal, IL 61761, USA. brgarner@chestnut.org
Objective:
To test whether pay for performance (P4P) is an effective method to improve adolescent substance use disorder treatment implementation and efficacy.
Design:
Cluster randomized trial.
Setting:
Community-based treatment organizations.
Participants:
Twenty-nine community-based treatment organizations, 105 therapists, and 986 adolescent patients (953 with complete data).
Intervention:
Community-based treatment organizations were assigned to 1 of the following conditions: the implementation-as-usual (IAU) control condition or the P4P experimental condition. In addition to delivering the same evidence-based treatment (ie, using the Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach [A-CRA]), each organization received standardized levels of funding, training, and coaching from the treatment developers. Therapists in the P4P condition received US $50 for each month that they demonstrated competence in treatment delivery (ie, A-CRA competence) and US $200 for each patient who received a specified number of treatment procedures and sessions (ie, target A-CRA) that has been found to be associated with significantly improved patient outcomes.
Main Outcome Measures:
Outcomes included ACRA competence (ie, a therapist-level implementation measure), target A-CRA (ie, a patient-level implementation measure), and remission status (ie, a patient-level treatment effectiveness measure).
Results:
Relative to therapists in the IAU control condition, therapists in the P4P condition were significantly more likely to demonstrate A-CRA competence (24.0% vs 8.9%; event rate ratio, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.12- 4.48; P=.02). Relative to patients in the IAU control condition, patients in the P4P condition were significantly more likely to receive target A-CRA (17.3% vs 2.5%; odds ratio, 5.19; 95% CI, 1.53-17.62; P=.01). However, no significant differences were found between conditions with regard to patients' end-of-treatment remission status.
Conclusion:
Pay for performance can be an effective method of improving treatment implementation.
Trial Registration:
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01016704
More Related Videos
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
08:05A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Drug Therapy
Antianxiety Medications
Drug Abuse and Addiction: Pharmacological Phenomena