Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
Test-retest reliability and discriminant validity of the SWAP-200 in a psychoanalytic treatment sample
Rosemary Cogan1, John H Porcerelli
1Department of Psychology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-2051, USA. r.cogan@ttu.edu
Abstract:
To assess the test-retest reliability of the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure-200 (SWAP-200) personality disorder, high functioning, and Q-factor (trait/symptom) scales, we correlated the reports of 47 psychoanalysts describing a patient at the beginning of analysis and at 6 months of analysis. Since the length of psychoanalysis averages almost 6 years, and since personality disorders change slowly, we hypothesized that the test-retest reliabilities of the personality disorder scale scores would be higher than those of the Q-factor scales, which should change more quickly. The average personality disorder scale test-retest reliability was r = .82 and the average Q-factor scale test-retest reliability was r = .64. The values for mismatched cases were .02 and -.05, respectively. Analysts also provided a clinical Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) diagnosis for each of 77 patients. The SWAP-200 scores for patients with an Axis I diagnosis of depression and for four of the five Axis II diagnoses with four or more cases provide support for the validity of the SWAP-200.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Psychodynamic Therapy
