Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026
11:52
Analysis of LINE-1 Retrotransposition at the Single Nucleus Level
Published on: April 23, 2016
Molecular reconstruction of extinct LINE-1 elements and their interaction with nonautonomous elements
Bradley J Wagstaff1, Emily N Kroutter, Rebecca S Derbes
1Department of Epidemiology and Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Molecular Biology and Evolution
|August 25, 2012
Summary
Ancient human retroelements, long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1 or L1) and Alu, show similar activity and Alu mobilization capabilities. Evidence for coevolution between LINEs and SINEs is not apparent in this study.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Molecular Biology
- Evolutionary Biology
Background:
- Non-long terminal repeat retroelements, including LINE-1 (L1) and Alu, significantly impact the human genome.
- Alu elements are nonautonomous and depend on L1 for retrotransposition, suggesting potential antagonistic coevolution.
- Extinct L1 subfamilies are challenging to study compared to conserved Alu sequences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the retrotransposition capabilities of ancestral L1 elements (L1PA4 and L1PA8).
- To assess the ability of ancestral L1 elements to mobilize Alu elements.
- To explore evidence for coevolution between L1 and Alu elements.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of synonymous versus nonsynonymous codon evolution in L1 subfamilies.
- Recreation and evaluation of retrotransposition capabilities of ancestral L1 elements (L1PA4, L1PA8) in cell culture assays.
- Assessment of the trans-mobilization efficiency of Alu elements by ancestral L1 elements.
Main Results:
- The C-terminal ORF2 cys domain of L1 experienced increased substitution rates during the L1PA5 to L1PA4 transition.
- Both ancestral L1PA4 and L1PA8 elements exhibit comparable retrotransposition activity to modern L1PA1.
- Ancestral L1 elements efficiently trans-mobilize various Alu subfamilies, with some subfamily-specific variations observed.
Conclusions:
- The study did not find clear evidence of coevolution between LINEs and SINEs based on retrotransposition efficiency.
- Population dynamics and stochastic factors likely influence LINE and SINE subfamily amplification.
- Cellular factors may play a crucial role in mediating LINE-SINE interactions and coevolutionary dynamics over evolutionary time.
Related Concept Videos
02:13Overview of Transposition and Recombination
Transposons make up a significant part of genomes of various organisms. Therefore, it is believed that transposition played a major evolutionary role in speciation by changing genome sizes and modifying gene expression patterns. For example, in bacteria, transposition can lead to conferring antibiotic resistance. Movement of transposable elements within the genetic pool of pathogenic bacteria can aid in transfer of antibiotic-resistant genetic elements. In eukaryotes, transposons can carry out...
02:54Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
03:18Non-LTR Retrotransposons
As the name suggests, non-LTR retrotransposons lack the long terminal repeats characteristic of the LTR retrotransposons. Additionally, both LTR and non-LTR retrotransposons use distinct mechanisms of mobilization. Non-LTR retrotransposons are further divided into two classes - Long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) and short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs), both of which occur abundantly in most mammals, including humans. Some of the active non-LTR retrotransposons in humans are L1...
02:31Synteny and Evolution
John H. Renwick first coined the term “synteny” in 1971, which refers to the genes present on the same chromosomes, even if they are not genetically linked. The species with common ancestry tend to show conserved syntenic regions. Therefore, the concept of synteny is nowadays used to describe the evolutionary relationship between species.
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral chromosome underwent...
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral chromosome underwent...
01:49Conserved Binding Sites
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
01:28Microbial Phylogeny
Understanding the evolutionary relationships among microorganisms is fundamental to microbial ecology and taxonomy. Phylogenetic trees are essential tools for inferring these relationships, relying primarily on comparative analyses of molecular sequences such as DNA, RNA, or proteins. In microbial studies, these trees typically depict the evolutionary paths of diverse bacterial and archaeal species by mapping genetic differences accumulated over time.Phylogenetic trees are composed of tips,...