Methods for assessment of health outcomes in children with burn injury: the Multi-Center Benchmarking Study

Lewis E Kazis1, Austin F Lee, Michelle Hinson

  • 1Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA. lek@bu.edu

Insights

The Multi-Center Benchmarking Study (MCBS) established a new model for tracking pediatric burn injury outcomes. This long-term cohort study effectively monitored health and quality of life in young burn patients.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric burn injury research
  • Longitudinal cohort studies
  • Health outcomes assessment

Background:

  • The Multi-Center Benchmarking Study (MCBS) introduced an innovative approach to monitor health outcomes in pediatric burn patients.
  • Burn injuries in children and adolescents require specialized, long-term monitoring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present the methodologies of a multicenter long-term cohort study tracking 1,140 children and adolescents with burn injuries.
  • To detail patient-centered health assessments, clinical data collection, and validated questionnaire use.

Main Methods:

  • A multicenter long-term cohort study design involving 1,140 pediatric burn patients followed for up to 4 years.
  • Utilized the Burn Outcomes Questionnaire (BOQ) and Short-Form Psychosocial Questionnaire for patient-centered data.
  • Employed mixed models and generalized estimating equations for analyzing complex, repeated-measures data.

Main Results:

  • Achieved high accrual rates (93%) and substantial follow-up completion (65%).
  • Presented recovery curves for key BOQ domains (upper extremity function, patient compliance, parental concern) in children aged 5-18.
  • Demonstrated the BOQ's sensitivity and responsiveness in capturing changes in recovery over time.

Conclusions:

  • The MCBS methodology provides a robust model for multicenter studies on pediatric burn survivors.
  • This approach is effective for tracking clinical status and quality of life in children with burn injuries.
  • The study highlights the importance of long-term follow-up and patient-centered outcome measures.
Abstract