Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Learning Disabilities01:25

Learning Disabilities

Learning disabilities are cognitive disorders caused by neurological impairments that affect cognitive functions like language and reading, without indicating overall intellectual or developmental challenges. These disabilities differ from global intellectual or developmental disabilities as they are limited to distinct cognitive functions. Common learning disabilities include dysgraphia, dyslexia, and dyscalculia, each of which impacts unique aspects of learning.
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Language Development01:22

Language Development

Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
Components of Language01:24

Components of Language

Language, whether spoken, signed, or written, consists of specific components: lexicon and grammar. The lexicon is the vocabulary of a language, comprising its words. Grammar is the set of rules used to convey meaning through the lexicon. For example, English grammar adds “-ed” to most verbs to indicate past tense. Words are formed by combining phonemes, which are the basic sound units of a language. Different languages have different sets of phonemes (e.g., “ah” vs. “eh”). Phonemes combine to...
Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language01:10

Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language

Language is a system of communication that allows the expression of thoughts, ideas, and feelings. The brain processes language in both hemispheres.
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

tDCS modulates speech perception and production in second language learners.

Scientific reports·2022
Same author

The effects of maternal smartphone use on mother-child interaction.

Child development·2021
Same author

Linking L2 proficiency and patterns of functional connectivity during L1 word retrieval.

Brain and language·2021
Same author

Spontaneous cognition and its relationship to human creativity: A functional connectivity study involving a chain free association task.

NeuroImage·2020
Same author

Language mixing patterns in a bilingual individual with non-fluent aphasia.

Aphasiology·2019
Same author

A Semantic Network Cartography of the Creative Mind.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

Naming abilities in low-proficiency second language learners.

Katy Borodkin1, Miriam Faust

  • 11Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.

Journal of Learning Disabilities
|August 30, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Low second language (L2) proficiency may stem from a general weakness in retrieving word sounds, impacting both native (L1) and L2 naming abilities. This phonological retrieval issue, not just low L2 skill, affects learners.

Keywords:
bilingualismdyslexianamingsecond language learningtip-of-the-tongue

More Related Videos

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing
09:00

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Published on: August 16, 2024

Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment
05:19

Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment

Published on: June 1, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing
09:00

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Published on: August 16, 2024

Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment
05:19

Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment

Published on: June 1, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Second language (L2) learning difficulties are often linked to native language (L1) issues like dyslexia.
  • However, some individuals with low L2 proficiency show intact L1 reading skills but struggle with word recall (tip-of-the-tongue states).
  • This suggests a potential underlying issue in phonological code retrieval affecting L2 learners.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if phonological word form retrieval weaknesses, observed in L1 naming, also impact L2 naming abilities.
  • To test the hypothesis that naming difficulties are shared across languages in L2 learners.
  • To compare the performance of low-proficiency L2 learners with high-proficiency learners and individuals with dyslexia.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the tip-of-the-tongue experimental paradigm.
  • Assessed L2 learners (low-proficiency n=15, high-proficiency n=23) and individuals with dyslexia (n=16).
  • Measured frequency of tip-of-the-tongue states, word mispronunciation, and benefit from phonological cuing.

Main Results:

  • Low-proficiency L2 learners reported more tip-of-the-tongue states than high-proficiency learners.
  • Low-proficiency L2 learners mispronounced retrieved words more often and benefited less from phonological cues.
  • Some low-proficiency L2 learners performed worse than individuals with dyslexia on specific naming tasks.

Conclusions:

  • L2 naming difficulties in low-proficiency learners are linked to a general weakness in phonological word form retrieval, not solely low L2 proficiency.
  • This phonological retrieval weakness appears to be shared across both L1 and L2.
  • Findings support a distinct cognitive profile for low-proficiency L2 learners, characterized by shared cross-linguistic retrieval deficits.