Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Negative priming for target selection with saccadic eye movements.

Tim Donovan1, Trevor J Crawford, Damien Litchfield

  • 1Health and Medical Sciences, University of Cumbria, Lancaster, LA1 3JD, UK. tim.donovan@cumbria.ac.uk

Experimental Brain Research
|September 1, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comorbidity Burden as a Determinant of Treatment Pathway After Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Tube Placement for Acute Cholecystitis: Experience From an Appalachian Tertiary Referral Center.

The American surgeon·2026
Same author

Cognitive function is associated with the progression of non-tremor motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease.

Frontiers in aging neuroscience·2026
Same author

Treatment experiences, preferences, and expectations for cognitive impairments in long COVID among Chinese young and older adults: a constructivist grounded theory study.

BMC medicine·2025
Same author

Supplemental Donor Milk vs Infant Formula in Moderate to Late Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA pediatrics·2025
Same author

Saccadic eye movements differentiate functional cognitive disorder from mild cognitive impairment.

Perception·2025
Same author

Correction: Specific visual expertise reduces susceptibility to visual illusions.

Scientific reports·2025
Same journal

Changes in synergy formation and modulation during cyclic finger force production tasks in female adults with dystonic cerebral palsy.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Molecular links between reelin downregulation, topoisomerase IIβ alterations, and proteins involved in Alzheimer pathology in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Exploring Sevoflurane promotes hippocampal neuron mitophagy in elderly postoperative cognitive dysfunction by HSP90AA1 based on network pharmacology.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Loading modulates monosynaptic transmission from spindle primary afferents to motoneurons in humans.

Experimental brain research·2026
See all related articles

Negative priming facilitates recent target selection in eye movements, but does not inhibit distracters unless under competitive conditions. This research clarifies target selection mechanisms in visual attention.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Negative priming is a phenomenon where previously ignored stimuli are harder to process.
  • Understanding negative priming's role in target selection for eye movements is crucial for visual attention research.
  • Distinguishing between object-based and spatial effects in negative priming is key to understanding attentional mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether negative priming influences target selection for saccadic eye movements.
  • To determine the conditions under which negative priming occurs.
  • To differentiate between object-based and spatial negative priming effects.

Main Methods:

  • A series of experiments using visual search tasks with saccadic eye movement recordings.

More Related Videos

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function
05:44

Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function

Published on: July 14, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function
05:44

Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function

Published on: July 14, 2016

  • Manipulating semantic relatedness and feature similarity between targets and distracters.
  • Introducing competitive selection conditions in later experiments.

    • Main Results:

    • Experiment 1 showed facilitation for recently fixated targets, irrespective of location.
    • Subsequent experiments confirmed target facilitation and found no evidence of distracter inhibition.
    • Experiments 4 and 5 revealed spatial inhibition at the location of previous distracters under competitive conditions.

    Conclusions:

    • Negative priming primarily facilitates recently attended targets, rather than inhibiting distracters.
    • Spatial inhibition emerges only when there is competitive selection between target and distracter locations.
    • Analyzing eye movement data alongside response times is essential for understanding spatial negative priming.