Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Qualitative Analysis03:46

Qualitative Analysis

For solutions containing mixtures of different cations, the identity of each cation can be determined by qualitative analysis. This technique involves a series of selective precipitations with different chemical reagents, each reaction producing a characteristic precipitate for a specific group of cations. Metal ions within a group are further separated by varying the pH, heating the mixture to redissolve a precipitate, or adding other reagents to form complex ions.
For instance, group IV...
Qualitative Analysis01:10

Qualitative Analysis

Qualitative analysis is the process of identifying elements, ions, or compounds in an unknown sample. It is the first and most fundamental type of analysis based on the hierarchy of analytical goals. This hierarchy is significant as it provides a structured approach to scientific research, with qualitative analysis serving as the initial step, providing essential information before moving on to quantitative or other forms of analysis.
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nursing's professional character: A chimera?

Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals·2024
Same author

Can professional nursing value claims be refused? Might nursing values be accepted provisionally and tentatively?

Nursing inquiry·2024
Same author

Can philosophy benefit nurses and/or nursing? Heidegger and Strauss, problems of knowledge and context.

Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals·2023
Same author

Complexity and ambition in nurse education.

Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals·2022
Same author

Teaching the ideas of others: Is there a problem?

Journal of advanced nursing·2022
Same author

The replication crisis.

Journal of advanced nursing·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 18, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

Abductive reasoning and qualitative research.

Martin Lipscomb1

  • 1Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of England, Gloucester, UK. martin.lipscomb@uwe.ac.uk

Nursing Philosophy : an International Journal for Healthcare Professionals
|September 7, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Abduction, a form of reasoning, is proposed for qualitative data analysis in nursing research. However, its fallible nature may compromise the action-guiding potential of findings.

Area of Science:

  • Nursing Research
  • Qualitative Data Analysis
  • Philosophy of Science

Background:

  • Deduction and induction are established reasoning methods in nursing literature.
  • Abduction, a third form of reasoning, has been underutilized by nurse scholars.
  • This paper explores the potential role of abduction in qualitative data analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose abduction as a method for identifying themes, codes, and categories in qualitative data.
  • To examine the implications of using abduction in qualitative research.
  • To address challenges associated with abductive inference in research.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of abductive reasoning within qualitative research.
  • Exploration of the interplay between abduction, deduction, and induction.

More Related Videos

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 18, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

  • Examination of the 'generality problem' and the role of auxiliary theories.
  • Main Results:

    • Abductively derived claims in qualitative research require deductive and inductive support, which presents challenges.
    • The 'generality problem' complicates the selection of hypotheses for themes, codes, and categories.
    • Background and auxiliary theories are crucial for adjudicating between hypotheses.

    Conclusions:

    • Acknowledging the fallible nature of abduction is essential when used in qualitative research.
    • The use of abduction may compromise the action-guiding potential of qualitative research findings.
    • Further consideration is needed on integrating abductive inference into qualitative methodologies.