Related Experiment Videos
Evaluating the use of preoperative antibiotics in pediatric orthopaedic surgery
Nathan Formaini1, Paul Jacob, Leisel Willis
1Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Insights
Prophylactic antibiotics are not essential for most minimally invasive pediatric orthopedic procedures. This study found no significant difference in infection rates, suggesting potential cost savings and reduced antibiotic resistance.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Orthopedics
- Infectious Disease Prevention
- Surgical Site Infections
Background:
- Prophylactic antibiotic use in pediatric orthopedic surgery is not well-established for minimally invasive procedures.
- Minimally invasive orthopedic procedures carry a low risk of surgical site infection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the necessity of preoperative antibiotics in pediatric minimally invasive orthopedic surgery.
- To determine if antibiotics significantly reduce surgical site infections requiring debridement within 30 days.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 2330 pediatric patients undergoing minimally invasive orthopedic procedures.
- Comparison of infection rates between patients who received preoperative antibiotics and those who did not.
- Analysis of repeat procedures for deep infection within 30 days.
Main Results:
- Only 1 patient (0.0008%) in the non-antibiotic group required surgery for infection.
- No infections requiring reoperation occurred in the antibiotic group.
- No significant difference in infection rates was observed between the two groups.
Conclusions:
- Prophylactic antibiotics may not be indicated for many minimally invasive pediatric orthopedic procedures.
- Evidence-based guidelines are needed to optimize antibiotic use, improve cost-effectiveness, and combat antibiotic resistance.
- Further research is warranted to establish routine antibiotic protocols for this patient population.
Purpose Of The Study:
To evaluate the rate of infection after minimally invasive procedures on a consecutive series of pediatric orthopaedic patients. We hypothesized that the use of preoperative antibiotics for minimally invasive pediatric orthopaedic procedures does not significantly reduce the incidence of surgical site infection requiring surgical debridement within 30 days of the primary procedure.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed 2330 patients having undergone minimally invasive orthopaedic procedures at our institution between March 2008 and November 2010. Knee arthroscopy, closed reduction with percutaneous fixation, soft tissue releases, excision of bony or soft-tissue masses, and removal of hardware constituted the vast majority of included procedures. Two groups, based on whether prophylactic antibiotics were administered before surgery, were created and the incidence of a repeat procedure required for deep infection was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed to determine significance, if any, between the 2 groups.
Results:
Chart review of the 2330 patients identified 1087 as having received preoperative antibiotics, whereas the remaining 1243 patients did not receive antibiotics before surgery. Only 1 patient out of the 1243 cases in which antibiotics were not given required additional surgery within 30 days of the primary procedure due to a complicated surgical site infection (an incidence of 0.0008%). No patients in the antibiotic group developed a postoperative infection within 30 days requiring a return to the operating room for management. Our data revealed no significant increase in the incidence of complicated infection requiring additional procedures when antibiotics were not administered before surgery.
Discussion:
Though prophylactic antibiotics have been shown to confer numerous benefits for patients undergoing relatively major operations, their use in cases of minimally invasive and/or percutaneous orthopaedic surgery is not well defined. Our data suggest that the use of prophylactic antibiotics may not be indicated for many less invasive procedures when performed in a low-risk pediatric population. Future studies are warranted to help establish evidence-based guidelines regarding the routine use of prophylactic antibiotics in this specific population, hopefully resulting in improved cost-effectiveness and safety while slowing the emergence of new drug-resistant organisms.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III, retrospective comparative.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test