Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

Ultrasound Cyclo Plasty in Eyes with Glaucoma
Published on: January 26, 2018
[Medical malpractice in ophthalmology]
1Klinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf. Kristina.Spaniol@med.uni-duesseldorf.de
Background:
The increasing number of patients taking action for medical malpractice (MM) is a burden for the medical practitioners accused. After the assessment through an arbitration committee, which is free of cost for the patients,a large number of lawsuits can be avoided. Discussion of patient complaints and analyzing cases of MM is an important concern for the medical community in order to reduce errors in treatment and to contribute to patient safety.
Material And Methods:
The patient applications to the arbitration committee of the medical association of North-Rhine ("Gutachterkommission Nordrhein") for review of MM in the field of ophthalmology in the years 1999-2010 were analyzed statistically.
Results:
In the years 1999-2010 a total of 583 cases were related to ophthalmology (3% of all cases) and in 122 cases (21%) MM was recognized by the committee. In 61% of the cases MM was caused by errors in diagnosis, in 24% by errors in processes and in 15% by errors in surgical procedures.
Conclusions:
The proportion of ophthalmological cases in the total number of MM cases is low. Most errors in diagnosis are caused by the lack of basic diagnostic on examination procedures. Errors in processes are caused by instrumental errors and deficient communication. An important reason for errors in surgical procedures is a deficient management of complications. A standardized workflow of medical examinations and a quality management can help to avoid MM.
Insights
Medical malpractice cases in ophthalmology are infrequent but often stem from diagnostic errors. Improving diagnostic procedures and quality management can enhance patient safety and reduce medical malpractice claims.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Law
- Patient Safety
Context:
- Medical malpractice (MM) litigation poses a significant burden on healthcare professionals.
- Arbitration committees can help mitigate lawsuits by reviewing patient complaints.
- Analyzing MM cases is crucial for improving treatment and patient safety.
Purpose:
- To statistically analyze patient applications for medical malpractice review in ophthalmology.
- To identify common causes of medical malpractice in ophthalmic cases.
Summary:
- Ophthalmology accounted for 3% of medical malpractice cases reviewed between 1999-2010.
- Medical malpractice was recognized in 21% of these cases.
- Key causes included diagnostic errors (61%), procedural errors (24%), and surgical errors (15%).
Impact:
- Most diagnostic errors result from a lack of basic examination procedures.
- Procedural errors are linked to instrumental issues and poor communication.
- Deficient complication management is a major cause of surgical errors.
- Standardized workflows and quality management can reduce medical malpractice.
Related Concept Videos
Glaucoma: Overview
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Torts I
Intentional...
Focusing of Light in the Eye
