Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
Published on: March 31, 2022
Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a systematic, retrospective study
Serina Stretton1, Narelle J Bramich, Janelle R Keys
1ProScribe Medical Communications, Noosaville, Queensland, Australia. ss@proscribe.com.au
Plagiarism is significantly more common in retracted medical publications when first authors are from lower-income countries. This study highlights disparities in research integrity and informs strategies to combat scientific misconduct.
Area of Science:
- Medical Literature Analysis
- Bibliometrics
- Research Integrity
Background:
- Scientific misconduct, including plagiarism, poses a threat to the integrity of medical research.
- Understanding the factors associated with plagiarism is crucial for developing effective prevention strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if plagiarism is more prevalent in retracted medical publications authored by individuals from lower-income countries compared to higher-income countries.
- To identify other factors, such as publication type and journal ranking, associated with plagiarism in retracted articles.
Main Methods:
- A systematic, retrospective bibliometric study was conducted using retracted publications from MEDLINE (1966-2008).
- Retracted articles were classified based on the first author's country affiliation (income level, national language), publication type, and journal ranking.
- Statistical analyses, including odds ratios (OR) and confidence limits (CL), were performed to assess associations.
Main Results:
- Plagiarism accounted for 41.8% of misconduct retractions, with falsification/fabrication being the most common (52.1%).
- First authors from lower-income countries had significantly higher odds of plagiarism retractions (OR: 15.4) compared to those from higher-income countries.
- Plagiarism retractions were also associated with non-English national language (OR: 3.2), non-original research (OR: 8.4), case reports (OR: 4.2), and low-ranked journals (OR: 4.9).
Conclusions:
- This study provides the first evidence linking retracted plagiarism to first authors affiliated with lower-income countries.
- The findings underscore the need for targeted, evidence-based strategies and resource allocation to address and mitigate plagiarism in global medical research.
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis
Social Traps
Restarting Stalled Replication Forks
Self-Discrepancy Theory
