Adaptive prior variance calibration in the Bayesian continual reassessment method
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
Jin Zhang1, Thomas M Braun, Jeremy M G Taylor
1Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA. zhjin@umich.edu
Abstract:
The use of the continual reassessment method (CRM) and other model-based approaches to design Phase I clinical trials has increased owing to the ability of the CRM to identify the maximum tolerated dose better than the 3 + 3 method. However, the CRM can be sensitive to the variance selected for the prior distribution of the model parameter, especially when a small number of patients are enrolled. Although methods have emerged to adaptively select skeletons and to calibrate the prior variance only at the beginning of a trial, there has not been any approach developed to adaptively calibrate the prior variance throughout a trial. We propose three systematic approaches to adaptively calibrate the prior variance during a trial and compare them via simulation with methods proposed to calibrate the variance at the beginning of a trial.
Related Concept Videos
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Variation
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
Instrument Calibration
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
