Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Cardiac surgery versus stenting: what is better for the patient?
J James B Edelman1, Michael K Wilson, Paul G Bannon
1Cardiothoracic Surgical Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. jjbedelman@gmail.com
Insights
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains superior to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for complex three-vessel disease. PCI may be equivalent for less complex cases, indicating personalized treatment strategies for coronary artery disease.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Significant shifts in myocardial revascularization patterns over the last decade.
- Increasing use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for complex coronary lesions historically treated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the latest evidence comparing PCI and CABG for multi-vessel and left main coronary artery disease.
- To analyze mid- to long-term outcomes from recent clinical trials.
Main Methods:
- Review of recently published trial data comparing PCI and CABG.
- Analysis of major adverse cardiac events and outcomes based on coronary lesion complexity (SYNTAX score).
Main Results:
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) demonstrates superiority over percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in three-vessel disease, showing lower rates of major adverse cardiac events.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may offer equivalent outcomes to CABG for three-vessel disease in patients with the lowest complexity scores (SYNTAX <22).
Conclusions:
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the preferred revascularization strategy for complex multi-vessel and left main coronary artery disease.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) presents a viable alternative for selected patients with less complex coronary artery disease, warranting individualized treatment decisions.
Abstract:
Patterns of myocardial revascularization have changed significantly over the past decade. There has been a relative decrease of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and some patients are undergoing PCI for coronary lesions traditionally reserved for CABG. The mid- to long-term results of several trials comparing PCI with CABG have recently been published. For three-vessel disease, CABG is superior to PCI, with lower rates of major adverse cardiac events. PCI may be equivalent to CABG for three-vessel disease in the lowest disease complexity tercile (SYNTAX score <22; ∼20% of patients). This review focuses on the most recent evidence for myocardial revascularization in patients with multi-vessel and left main coronary artery disease.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
