Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual interactions with luminance and chromatic stimuli.

G R Cole1, C F Stromeyer, R E Kronauer

  • 1Division of Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and Image Science
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of a novel SCADA system for laboratory testing.

ISA transactions·2004
Same author

Temporal asymmetry in motion masking: a shortening of the temporal impulse response function.

Vision research·2003
Same author

Human temporal impulse response speeds up with increased stimulus contrast.

Vision research·2003
Same author

Intrinsic near-24-h pacemaker period determines limits of circadian entrainment to a weak synchronizer in humans.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2001
Same author

Thomas McMahon: a dedication in memoriam.

Annual review of biomedical engineering·2001
Same author

Is there an intrinsic period of the circadian clock? Response.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2001

Visual perception of luminance and chromatic flashes is modulated by coincident pedestal flashes. Luminance pedestals enhance chromatic detection, unlike luminance or chromatic pedestals which cause masking.

Area of Science:

  • Visual Neuroscience
  • Psychophysics
  • Color Vision

Background:

  • Visual masking and facilitation are key phenomena in understanding visual perception.
  • The influence of luminance pedestals on chromatic detection is not fully understood.
  • Differentiating mechanisms for luminance and chromatic stimulus processing is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of luminance and chromatic pedestals on the detection of luminance and chromatic test flashes.
  • To determine if pedestal type (luminance vs. chromatic) and condition (uncrossed vs. crossed) differentially affect visual sensitivity.
  • To explore the role of spatial configuration and surrounds in pedestal-induced effects.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a two-alternative forced-choice (2-AFC) paradigm to measure the visibility of brief flashes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed incremental (+Lum) and decremental (-Lum) luminance flashes, and green (+Chr) and red (-Chr) isoluminant chromatic flashes.
  • Tested various combinations of test and pedestal flashes, including uncrossed (Lum on Lum, Chr on Chr) and crossed (Chr on Lum, Lum on Chr) conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Uncrossed conditions (Lum on Lum, Chr on Chr) produced conventional dipper functions with masking effects.
    • Crossed conditions (Chr on Lum) showed no dipper function; luminance pedestals facilitated chromatic detection (2-3X) and linearized psychometric functions.
    • A luminance ring pedestal replicated the facilitation seen with uniform pedestals, suggesting spatial demarcation.
    • Removing the surround eliminated crossed facilitation but not uncrossed facilitation.

    Conclusions:

    • Distinct mechanisms underlie crossed and uncrossed visual facilitation and masking.
    • Luminance pedestals significantly enhance chromatic sensitivity through facilitation and linearization.
    • Spatial factors, like surrounds and pedestal configuration, play a role in mediating these effects.