Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

A Protocol to Set Up Needle-Free Connector with Positive Displacement on Central Venous Catheter in Intensive Care Unit
Published on: July 13, 2019
Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled
Claire M Rickard1, Joan Webster, Marianne C Wallis
1Research Centre for Clinical and Community Practice Innovation, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia. c.rickard@griffith.edu.au
Clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters is as effective as routine replacement. This approach reduces patient discomfort, healthcare costs, and staff workload by avoiding unnecessary procedures.
Area of Science:
- Medical Interventions
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Patient Safety
Background:
- Millions of peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) are used annually, with routine replacement every 72-96 hours recommended for adults.
- This standard practice increases healthcare costs, staff workload, and necessitates repeated invasive procedures for patients.
- The clinical effectiveness of routine PIVC replacement is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the hypothesis that clinically indicated PIVC replacement is equivalent in benefit to routine replacement.
- To evaluate the impact of PIVC replacement strategies on patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilization.
Main Methods:
- A multicentre, randomised, non-blinded equivalence trial involving adults (≥18 years) with PIVCs expected to be in use for over 4 days.
- Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either clinically indicated or routine (every third day) PIVC replacement.
- The primary outcome was phlebitis, with an equivalence margin set at 3%.
Main Results:
- Phlebitis occurred in 7% of patients in both the clinically indicated (114/1593) and routine replacement (114/1690) groups.
- The absolute risk difference for phlebitis was 0.41%, falling within the 3% equivalence margin.
- Mean catheter dwell time was longer in the clinically indicated group (99 hours) compared to the routine group (70 hours).
Conclusions:
- Clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters is an effective alternative to routine replacement.
- Adopting a clinically indicated replacement policy can significantly reduce catheter insertions, patient discomfort, and associated costs.
- Continued close monitoring and prompt removal of catheters upon complication are essential.
Related Concept Videos
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview

