Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey
Jennifer Marie Tetzlaff1, David Moher, An-Wen Chan
1Ottawa Methods Centre, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada. jtetzlaff@ohri.ca
Background:
Recent evidence has highlighted deficiencies in clinical trial protocols, having implications for many groups. Existing guidelines for randomized clinical trial (RCT) protocol content vary substantially and most do not describe systematic methodology for their development. As one of three prespecified steps for the systematic development of a guideline for trial protocol content, the objective of this study was to conduct a three-round Delphi consensus survey to develop and refine minimum content for RCT protocols.
Methods:
Panellists were identified using a multistep iterative approach, met prespecified minimum criteria and represented key stakeholders who develop or use clinical trial protocols. They were asked to rate concepts for importance in a minimum set of items for RCT protocols. The main outcome measures were degree of importance (scale of 1 to 10; higher scores indicating higher importance) and level of consensus for items. Results were presented as medians, interquartile ranges, counts and percentages.
Results:
Ninety-six expert panellists participated in the Delphi consensus survey including trial investigators, methodologists, research ethics board members, funders, industry, regulators and journal editors. Response rates were between 88 and 93% per round. Overall, panellists rated 63 of 88 concepts of high importance (of which 50 had a 25th percentile rating of 8 or greater), 13 of moderate importance (median 6 or 7) and 12 of low importance (median less than or equal to 5) for minimum trial protocol content. General and item-specific comments and subgroup results provided valuable insight for further discussions.
Conclusions:
This Delphi process achieved consensus from a large panel of experts from diverse stakeholder groups on essential content for RCT protocols. It also highlights areas of divergence. These results, complemented by other empirical research and consensus meetings, are helping guide the development of a guideline for protocol content.
Insights
Experts reached consensus on essential content for randomized clinical trial (RCT) protocols using a Delphi survey. This work guides the development of standardized RCT protocol guidelines.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials
- Research Methodology
- Health Sciences
Background:
- Clinical trial protocols often exhibit deficiencies impacting various stakeholders.
- Existing guidelines for randomized clinical trial (RCT) protocol content lack standardization and systematic development methods.
- This study is a key step in developing a comprehensive guideline for RCT protocol content.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and refine minimum content requirements for randomized clinical trial (RCT) protocols.
- To establish a consensus on essential items for RCT protocols through a systematic process.
- To inform the creation of a standardized guideline for clinical trial protocol development.
Main Methods:
- A three-round Delphi consensus survey was employed.
- Expert panellists (n=96) from diverse stakeholder groups were recruited iteratively.
- Panellists rated the importance of protocol content items, with consensus levels analyzed.
Main Results:
- Sixty-three of 88 concepts were rated as highly important for minimum RCT protocol content.
- Fifty concepts achieved a high importance rating (25th percentile ≥ 8).
- Moderate and low importance items were also identified, providing nuanced insights.
Conclusions:
- A diverse panel of experts achieved consensus on essential RCT protocol content.
- The Delphi process identified areas of agreement and divergence in protocol requirements.
- Findings will contribute to developing a robust guideline for clinical trial protocol content.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Preclinical Development: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches
