Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

07:46
Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models
Published on: November 15, 2013
J/ψ suppression at forward rapidity in Pb-Pb collisions at √s(NN) = 2.76 TeV
Physical Review Letters
|September 26, 2012
Summary
The ALICE experiment observed suppressed J/ψ meson production in lead-lead (Pb-Pb) collisions at high energy. This suppression, quantified by the nuclear modification factor, suggests charmonium interaction within a deconfined partonic phase.
Area of Science:
- High-energy nuclear physics
- Quark-gluon plasma studies
- Particle physics
Background:
- Heavy-ion collisions probe the state of matter under extreme conditions.
- J/ψ mesons are sensitive probes of the quark-gluon plasma.
- Previous studies indicated J/ψ suppression at lower energies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To measure inclusive J/ψ production in Pb-Pb collisions at √s(NN) = 2.76 TeV.
- To investigate the J/ψ nuclear modification factor (N(J/ψ)/N(pp)) as a function of centrality.
- To compare results with lower energy data and theoretical models.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing the ALICE detector at the Large Hadron Collider.
- Analyzing J/ψ → μ⁺μ⁻ decays in Pb-Pb and pp collisions.
- Calculating the nuclear modification factor by normalizing to binary nucleon-nucleon collisions.
Main Results:
- Observed significant suppression of inclusive J/ψ yield in Pb-Pb compared to scaled pp collisions.
- Measured a nuclear modification factor of 0.545 ± 0.032(stat) ± 0.083(syst) for central collisions (0-80%).
- Found no significant centrality dependence of the J/ψ nuclear modification factor.
Conclusions:
- The observed J/ψ suppression at 2.76 TeV differs from lower energy results.
- Data are consistent with models incorporating J/ψ production from deconfined charm quarks.
- Suggests charmonium interaction and potential regeneration within the quark-gluon plasma.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule
In the AX proton spin system, proton A can sense the two spin states of a coupled proton X, resulting in a doublet NMR signal with two peaks of equal (1:1) intensity. When proton A is coupled to two equivalent protons (AX2 spin system), the spin states of each X can be aligned with or against the external field, creating three possible scenarios. This results in a 1:2:1 triplet signal, where the central peak corresponds to the chemical shift of A and is twice as large or intense as the others.
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution
Near absolute zero temperatures, in the presence of a magnetic field, the majority of nuclei prefer the lower energy spin-up state to the higher energy spin-down state. As temperatures increase, the energy from thermal collisions distributes the spins more equally between the two states. The Boltzmann distribution equation gives the ratio of the number of spins predicted in the spin −½ (N−) and spin +½ (N+) states.
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are slanted or...
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are slanted or...

