Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026
A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
Published on: February 21, 2011
Auditory-perceptual speech outcomes and quality of life after total laryngectomy
Tanya L Eadie1, Adam M B Day, Devon E Sawin
1Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA. teadie@u.washington.edu
Objective:
(1) To determine potential relationships between speech intelligibility, acceptability, and self-reported quality of life (QOL) after total laryngectomy and (2) to determine whether relationships are stronger when QOL is measured by a head and neck cancer-specific or discipline-specific QOL scale.
Study Design:
Cross-sectional.
Setting:
University-based laboratory and speech clinic.
Subjects And Methods:
Twenty-five laryngectomized individuals completed disease-specific (University of Washington Quality of Life; UW-QOL) and discipline-specific (Voice Handicap Index-10; VHI-10) QOL scales. They also provided audio recordings that included the Sentence Intelligibility Test (SIT) and a reading passage. Thirty-three listeners transcribed the SIT sentences to yield intelligibility scores. Fifteen additional listeners judged speech acceptability of the reading passage using rating scales.
Results:
The QOL scores were moderate across the UW-QOL physical (mean = 77.63) and social-emotional (mean = 78.02) subscales and the VHI-10 (mean = 17.91). Speech acceptability and intelligibility varied across the samples, with acceptability only moderately related to intelligibility (r = 0.41, P < .05). Relationships were weak between ratings of intelligibility and self-reported QOL (range, r = 0.00-0.22) and weak to moderate between acceptability with QOL (range, r = 0.01-0.46). The only statistically significant, but moderate, relationship was found between speech acceptability with the UW-QOL speech subscore (r = 0.46, P < .05).
Conclusion:
Listeners' ratings of speech acceptability and intelligibility were not strongly predictive of disease-specific or voice-related QOL, suggesting that listener-rated and patient-reported outcomes are complementary.
