Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Response Surface Methodology01:16

Response Surface Methodology

Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Senior-Løken Syndrome Type 4 Masquerading as Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome.

Indian pediatrics·2026
Same author

The impact of Corona virus disease - 2019 on coronary atherosclerosis: Rationale and design of the COrona VIrus Disease-2019 computed tomography (COVID-CT) registry.

Progress in cardiovascular diseases·2026
Same author

From Policy to Practice: Knowledge gaps and training outcomes related to MASLD guidelines among medical officers in Chhattisgarh, India.

BMC health services research·2026
Same author

Recognition and remodelling of nucleosomes and hexasomes by the human INO80 complex.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same author

Mapping Research Trends in AI-Based Tourism and Hospitality Marketing: A Bibliometric and Thematic Review.

F1000Research·2026
Same author

From Childhood to Adulthood: Investigating the Utility of Radiographic Pettersson Score in Assessing Hemophilic Arthropathy Severity.

The Indian journal of radiology & imaging·2026
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 18, 2026

Image Recognition and Parameter Analysis of Concrete Vibration State Based on Support Vector Machine
08:27

Image Recognition and Parameter Analysis of Concrete Vibration State Based on Support Vector Machine

Published on: January 5, 2024

An enhanced MEMS error modeling approach based on Nu-Support Vector Regression.

Deepak Bhatt1, Priyanka Aggarwal, Prabir Bhattacharya

  • 1EECS Department, The University of Toledo, MS 308, 2801 W. Bancroft St., Toledo, OH 43606, USA. Deepak.bhatt@rockets.utoledo.edu

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|September 27, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces an enhanced Support Vector Machine (SVM) model for Micro Electro Mechanical System (MEMS) inertial sensor error modeling. The SVM approach significantly improves accuracy and reduces noise compared to traditional Gauss-Markov and Neural Network methods for navigation systems.

Keywords:
MEMS IMUNeural NetworkSupport Vector Machines

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 18, 2026

Image Recognition and Parameter Analysis of Concrete Vibration State Based on Support Vector Machine
08:27

Image Recognition and Parameter Analysis of Concrete Vibration State Based on Support Vector Machine

Published on: January 5, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Engineering
  • Sensor Technology
  • Navigation Systems

Background:

  • Micro Electro Mechanical System (MEMS)-based inertial sensors enable low-cost civilian land vehicle navigation.
  • Accurate modeling of MEMS sensor errors (biases, drift, noise) is crucial but challenging.
  • Conventional methods like Gauss-Markov (GM) and Neural Networks (NN) have limitations for MEMS units.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an enhanced Support Vector Machine (SVM) based error model for MEMS inertial sensors.
  • To overcome the drawbacks of GM and NN methods in modeling MEMS sensor errors.
  • To improve the accuracy and real-time implementation of low-cost navigation systems.

Main Methods:

  • Developed an enhanced Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm for MEMS sensor error modeling.
  • Compared the SVM approach against Gauss-Markov (GM) and Neural Network (NN) models.
  • Evaluated performance based on noise reduction and positional error drift.

Main Results:

  • The SVM approach reduced noise standard deviation by 10-35% for gyroscopes and 61-76% for accelerometers.
  • Positional error drifts under static conditions improved by 41% (vs. NN) and 80% (vs. GM).
  • SVM avoids local minimization and overfitting issues inherent in NN, providing a reliable global solution.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed SVM-based error model offers a superior solution for MEMS inertial sensor error modeling.
  • SVM provides a more accurate, efficient, and reliable method compared to GM and NN.
  • This advancement contributes to the development of more robust and precise low-cost navigation systems.