Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

Standardization and Maintenance of 3D Canine Hepatic and Intestinal Organoid Cultures for Use in Biomedical Research
Published on: January 31, 2022
Evaluation of survival of 3 different fixed space maintainers
Emine Sen Tunc1, Sule Bayrak, Nuray Tuloglu
1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey. sentunc@yahoo.com
Insights
The band and loop fixed space maintainer demonstrated the longest survival time and highest success rate compared to direct bonded and fiber-reinforced composite types in pediatric patients. This study highlights the superior performance of band and loop space maintainers.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Dentistry
- Orthodontics
- Biomaterials
Background:
- Space maintainers (SMs) are crucial in pediatric dentistry to preserve arch length after premature tooth loss.
- Different types of SMs exist, including band and loop (B&L), direct bonded (DB), and fiber-reinforced composite (FRC), each with varying clinical performance characteristics.
- Comparative data on the survival times and failure rates of these SMs is essential for clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comparatively evaluate the survival times and failure rates of different fixed space maintainer (SM) types.
- To determine which SM design offers superior long-term clinical performance in children.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving 30 children aged 4-10 years, divided into three groups based on SM type: B&L, DB, and FRC.
- Clinical evaluations were conducted every 3 months for 1 year or until SM failure.
- Survival times were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, with Cox regression used to assess confounding factors.
Main Results:
- The mean survival time was highest for B&L SMs (11.20 months), followed by DB SMs (9.20 months), and FRC SMs (6.70 months).
- Statistically significant differences in survival rates were observed between the SM types (log rank test, P=.002).
- Age, sex, dental arch, and jaw side did not significantly correlate with SM success.
Conclusions:
- Band and loop fixed space maintainers exhibited superior performance regarding survival time and success rates compared to direct bonded and fiber-reinforced composite space maintainers.
- The findings suggest that the B&L design is a more reliable option for space maintenance in the evaluated pediatric population.
- Further research could explore long-term outcomes and patient-reported factors for different SM types.
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to provide a comparative evaluation of the survival times and failure rates of different types of fixed space maintainers (SMs).
Methods:
A total of 30 4- to 10-year-olds were selected for the study. Children were divided into 3 groups, according to type of SM, namely: band and loop (B&L), direct bonded (DB), and fiber-reinforced composite (FRC). Patients were recalled once every 3 months for clinical evaluation for 1 year or until failure. The survival times of SMs were estimated by means of the Kaplan-Meier method, and confounding factors were investigated using Cox regression analysis.
Results:
Mean survival time was highest for B&L SMs (11.20 months), followed by DB SMs (9.20 months) and FRC SMs (6.70 months). There were statistically significant differences noted between types of SMs (log rank=11.99; P=.002). The Cox proportional hazards model revealed that age, sex, dental arch, and side of the jaw were not significantly correlated with "success of SMs" (P>.05).
Conclusions:
Band and loop fixed space maintainers showed superior performance in terms of both survival time and success rates versus direct bonded and fiber-reinforced composite space maintainers.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a survival tree begins...
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
Buoyancy and Stability for Submerged and Floating Bodies
