Related Experiment Videos
Effectiveness of screening for diabetes.
1Department of Biochemistry, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195.
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
|February 1, 1990
Summary
Screening for diabetes mellitus requires obligatory confirmatory oral glucose tolerance tests. Repeated fasting glucose tests and Hemoglobin A1c are less effective for diagnosing diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Preventive Medicine
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Diabetes mellitus is a growing public health concern.
- Effective screening strategies are crucial for early diagnosis and management.
- Current screening methods for diabetes mellitus have varying diagnostic yields.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic yield of screening for diabetes mellitus using fasting serum glucose and hemoglobin A1c.
- To compare the effectiveness and cost of different confirmatory testing methods.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of patient records from 6445 visits to an executive health surveillance program.
- Measurement of fasting serum glucose and hemoglobin A1c for screening.
- Confirmatory testing using oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) and repeated fasting glucose determination.
Main Results:
- Increased fasting serum glucose (≥ 6.6 mmol/L) was found in 3% of patients, with only half receiving confirmatory testing.
- Confirmatory OGTT revealed a 70% incidence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in those with elevated screening glucose.
- OGTT was equivalent in cost and superior in diagnostic yield to repeated fasting glucose determination.
- Hemoglobin A1c was unreliable for predicting impaired or diabetic glucose tolerance.
Conclusions:
- Obligatory confirmatory oral glucose tolerance testing is essential for maximizing the value of diabetes mellitus screening.
- Clinician preference for repeated glucose determination contributes to underdiagnosis.
- Current screening protocols may not be fully optimizing diabetes detection.