Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Differentiation between left bundle branch block and left ventricular hypertrophy: implications for cardiac
1Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA. david.strauss@fda.hhs.gov
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) benefits patients with complete left bundle branch block (LBBB). Differentiating true LBBB from conditions like left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is crucial for effective CRT.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves outcomes in heart failure patients with complete left bundle branch block (LBBB).
- Conventional electrocardiographic criteria may misdiagnose LBBB, potentially including patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and delayed activation.
- Distinguishing true LBBB from LVH is critical as CRT efficacy may differ.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the diagnostic challenges in differentiating complete LBBB from LVH and other intraventricular conduction delays.
- To emphasize the clinical importance of accurate LBBB diagnosis for CRT patient selection.
- To discuss proposed stricter criteria for diagnosing complete LBBB.
Main Methods:
- Review of clinical trial data on CRT efficacy in different conduction abnormalities.
- Analysis of endocardial mapping and simulation studies on LBBB misdiagnosis.
- Examination of proposed new diagnostic criteria for complete LBBB.
Main Results:
- CRT is effective in patients with complete LBBB but potentially not in those with RBBB or LVH-related conduction delays.
- Approximately one-third of patients diagnosed with LBBB may be misdiagnosed, often having LVH with delayed LV activation.
- Increased LV size and slowed conduction prolong QRS duration, mimicking LBBB in LVH patients.
Conclusions:
- Accurate differentiation between complete LBBB and LVH is essential for optimizing CRT.
- New diagnostic criteria for LBBB, including longer QRS duration thresholds and specific ECG findings, warrant further investigation.
- Further research is needed to refine diagnostic approaches for intraventricular conduction delays in the context of CRT.
Abstract:
Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces heart failure hospitalizations and mortality in patients with complete left bundle branch block (LBBB), but potentially not those with right bundle branch block or nonspecific LV conduction delay, such as that due to LV hypertrophy (LVH). Furthermore, endocardial mapping and simulation studies have suggested that one-third of patients diagnosed with LBBB by conventional electrocardiographic criteria are misdiagnosed, and these patients likely have a combination of LVH, LV chamber dilatation and delayed initiation of LV activation (incomplete LBBB). Increase in LV size due to hypertrophy/dilatation and slowed intramyocardial conduction velocity prolong QRS duration in patients with LVH, which can frequently go above the QRS duration threshold of 120 ms conventionally used to diagnose LBBB. New strict criteria for diagnosing complete LBBB have been proposed that utilize longer QRS duration thresholds (130 ms in women and 140 ms in men) and require the presence of mid-QRS notching/slurring in at least 2 of the leads I, aVL, V1, V2, V5 or V6. The emergence of CRT has led to an increased need to differentiate complete LBBB from LVH and other types of intraventricular conduction delay, which should be further studied.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction

