Related Experiment Videos
Discrepancy between tonometric ambulatory and cuff-based office blood pressure measurements in patients with type 1
Simone Theilade1, Maria Lajer, Christel Joergensen
1Steno Diabetes Center, Gentofte, Denmark. ktld@steno.dk
Insights
Ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring is feasible and preferred by patients with type 1 diabetes. This method reveals hypertension in over half of patients, highlighting discrepancies with office blood pressure readings.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Endocrinology
- Hypertension Management
Background:
- Type 1 diabetes is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular complications, including hypertension.
- Accurate blood pressure monitoring is crucial for managing hypertension and preventing complications in diabetic patients.
- Traditional office blood pressure (OBP) measurements may not fully capture the blood pressure profile.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) with office blood pressure (OBP) for diagnosing hypertension (HTN) in individuals with type 1 diabetes.
- To assess the prevalence of masked uncontrolled hypertension and isolated uncontrolled clinic hypertension.
- To evaluate patient tolerance and preference for tonometric ABP measurements.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 569 patients with type 1 diabetes.
- Ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) measured by tonometry and office blood pressure (OBP) by sphygmomanometry.
- Hypertension defined as blood pressure ≥ 130/80 mm Hg.
Main Results:
- Hypertension was diagnosed in 45% (24-hour ABP) to 66% (daytime ABP) of patients.
- Significant disagreement in diagnosing HTN between ABP and OBP was observed in 31% to 37% of patients.
- Tonometric ABP measurements were well-tolerated, successful in 98%, and preferred by 83% of patients.
Conclusions:
- Tonometric ABP measurement is a feasible and well-accepted method in type 1 diabetes patients.
- ABP monitoring reveals a higher prevalence of hypertension and significant discrepancies with OBP, indicating potential underdiagnosis with OBP alone.
- A substantial proportion of type 1 diabetes patients do not achieve target blood pressure goals, underscoring the need for improved monitoring and management strategies.
Abstract:
The aim of the current study was to compare ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) with office blood pressure (OBP) in diagnosing hypertension (HTN) in type 1 diabetes. The cross-sectional study included 569 type 1 diabetes patients, with a mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of 55 ± 13 years and diabetes duration of 33 ± 16 years, and 315 (55%) men. Blood pressure ≥ 130/80 mm Hg defined HTN. ABP was measured by tonometry and OBP by sphygmomanometry. Elevated ABP with normal OBP defined masked uncontrolled HTN, and normal ABP with elevated OBP defined isolated uncontrolled clinic HTN. Mean ± SD 24-hour ABP, daytime ABP, and OBP was 128 ± 16/75 ± 10 mm Hg, 133 ± 16/77 ± 11 mm Hg, and 136 ± 14/76 ± 8 mm Hg, respectively (P<.001). With 24-hour and daytime ABP, HTN was present in 256 (45%) and 304 (53%) patients; normal BP in 102 (18%) and 88 (15%) patients; isolated uncontrolled clinic HTN in 154 (27%) and 104 (%) patients; and masked uncontrolled HTN in 57 (10%) and 73 (13%) patients. Twenty-four-hour ABP and OBP showed disagreement in diagnosing HTN in 211 (37%) patients. Daytime ABP and OBP disagreed in 177 (31%) patients. HTN by 24-hour and daytime ABP was present in 313 (55%) and 377 (66%) patients. ABP measurements were well-tolerated and successful in 98%. A total of 92% would volunteer for repeat measurements and 83% preferred the tonometry to conventional cuff-based devices. In patients with type 1 diabetes, tonometric ABP measurements are feasible. ABP and OBP disagree in diagnosing HTN in 31% to 37% of patients. Furthermore, 55% to 66% of patients do not reach target BP of <130/80 mm Hg despite regular follow-up.
Related Concept Videos
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Sites for measuring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)